<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mikael of ImpeachforPeace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://impeachforpeace.org/blog</link>
	<description>Empowering citizens to hold our elected (or otherwise in power) servants accountable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:29:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CNN on 9/11: &#8220;No evidence a plane hit the Pentagon&#8221; by Jason Axley</title>
		<link>http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-55767</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Axley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=247#comment-55767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Itâ€™s understandable some believe that no 757 hit the Pentagon due to the clear evidence that no large plane parts existed outside on the lawn of the Pentagon. I think this video is crucial in sparking a necessary deeper look into the physics behind the seemingly &quot;disappearance&quot; of a 757 into the side of the pentagon. This videos intentions support the claim that, if a plane hit The Pentagon, then large pieces of debris, particularly things like wings, the engine, and the fuselage, should be scattered, yet all that is seen are small, insignificant pieces of debris, which seems to suggest that no plane really hit the Pentagon. However, this argument stems on the assumption that if no plane parts exist outside the Pentagon then no plane hit the Pentagon. This assumption, although seemingly logical, neglects the idea that the plane could have incinerated within the Pentagon. In 1988 Sandia National Labs tested an F-4 Phantom crashing into a wall of concrete at about 480 mph. The purpose of the test was to &quot;determine the impact force, versus time, due to the impact...â€” including both engines â€” onto a massive, essentially rigid reinforced concrete target.&quot;  The results of the study are astounding and can be viewed here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--_RGM4Abv8&amp;feature=related. The evidence clearly shows the plane, flying at similar speeds to that of Flight 77, completely dissipating as it strikes the concrete wall.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Itâ€™s understandable some believe that no 757 hit the Pentagon due to the clear evidence that no large plane parts existed outside on the lawn of the Pentagon. I think this video is crucial in sparking a necessary deeper look into the physics behind the seemingly &#8220;disappearance&#8221; of a 757 into the side of the pentagon. This videos intentions support the claim that, if a plane hit The Pentagon, then large pieces of debris, particularly things like wings, the engine, and the fuselage, should be scattered, yet all that is seen are small, insignificant pieces of debris, which seems to suggest that no plane really hit the Pentagon. However, this argument stems on the assumption that if no plane parts exist outside the Pentagon then no plane hit the Pentagon. This assumption, although seemingly logical, neglects the idea that the plane could have incinerated within the Pentagon. In 1988 Sandia National Labs tested an F-4 Phantom crashing into a wall of concrete at about 480 mph. The purpose of the test was to &#8220;determine the impact force, versus time, due to the impact&#8230;â€” including both engines â€” onto a massive, essentially rigid reinforced concrete target.&#8221;  The results of the study are astounding and can be viewed here: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--_RGM4Abv8&#038;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=&#8211;_RGM4Abv8&#038;feature=related</a>. The evidence clearly shows the plane, flying at similar speeds to that of Flight 77, completely dissipating as it strikes the concrete wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Letterman eviserates Limbaugh during Couric interview by Mikael</title>
		<link>http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=308&#038;cpage=1#comment-54479</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=308#comment-54479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Raoul,

&quot;Free-market capitalism&quot; is a windmill not worth tilting toward. When profiteers are left to their own devices unfettered, their inherent commitment to profit as the highest value will lead to the corruption and eventual collapse we are experiencing right now.

It is the lack of governmental (citizen-driven, hopefully) oversight and accountability that allowed for the garbage loans to flourish. The banks that dove into that pit should have just been allowed to fail, their assets auctioned off to the banks that followed wiser paths and the government backing up the insurance that covered the investors. We would be moving forward now instead of tossing good money after bad to continue to attempt to bail out floundering banks. Let them fail!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raoul,</p>
<p>&#8220;Free-market capitalism&#8221; is a windmill not worth tilting toward. When profiteers are left to their own devices unfettered, their inherent commitment to profit as the highest value will lead to the corruption and eventual collapse we are experiencing right now.</p>
<p>It is the lack of governmental (citizen-driven, hopefully) oversight and accountability that allowed for the garbage loans to flourish. The banks that dove into that pit should have just been allowed to fail, their assets auctioned off to the banks that followed wiser paths and the government backing up the insurance that covered the investors. We would be moving forward now instead of tossing good money after bad to continue to attempt to bail out floundering banks. Let them fail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Letterman eviserates Limbaugh during Couric interview by Raoul Duke</title>
		<link>http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=308&#038;cpage=1#comment-54376</link>
		<dc:creator>Raoul Duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 06:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=308#comment-54376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to agree that Rush is not a physically appealing man.  I would have been interested to hear what Couric and Letterman think about the content of Rush&#039;s message, however.  They summarized the points he tried to make, but did not refute them or propose alternatives.  Republicans proposed an alternative stimulus and it lost.  That&#039;s how democracy works.  There is discontent about the Democratic version that passed, as well, however, which is also how Democracy works.  You can&#039;t please 100% of the people 100% of the time.  I just want them to counter his ideas instead of his appearance.  Make me believe in the stimulus.  Not with Hope or Change, but with something that shows how this is not a weakening of free-market capitalism.

Perhaps I was expecting too much from them.  Limbaugh, Letterman, Rhodes, and O&#039;Riley are all entertainers, not objective journalists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree that Rush is not a physically appealing man.  I would have been interested to hear what Couric and Letterman think about the content of Rush&#8217;s message, however.  They summarized the points he tried to make, but did not refute them or propose alternatives.  Republicans proposed an alternative stimulus and it lost.  That&#8217;s how democracy works.  There is discontent about the Democratic version that passed, as well, however, which is also how Democracy works.  You can&#8217;t please 100% of the people 100% of the time.  I just want them to counter his ideas instead of his appearance.  Make me believe in the stimulus.  Not with Hope or Change, but with something that shows how this is not a weakening of free-market capitalism.</p>
<p>Perhaps I was expecting too much from them.  Limbaugh, Letterman, Rhodes, and O&#8217;Riley are all entertainers, not objective journalists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sarah Palin Debate Flow Chart&#8230; priceless&#8230; by Earl</title>
		<link>http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=306&#038;cpage=1#comment-53195</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 04:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=306#comment-53195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mikael,

Let me be the first to congratulate you on your man&#039;s victory. Although I didn&#039;t vote for him and didn&#039;t want him to win, he and Sen. McCain fought a good fight, at least by political standards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mikael,</p>
<p>Let me be the first to congratulate you on your man&#8217;s victory. Although I didn&#8217;t vote for him and didn&#8217;t want him to win, he and Sen. McCain fought a good fight, at least by political standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sarah Palin Debate Flow Chart&#8230; priceless&#8230; by Mikael</title>
		<link>http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=306&#038;cpage=1#comment-52945</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=306#comment-52945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I catch almost all the Comedy Central and SNL stuff online after the fact. I didn&#039;t create this flow chart, I am just happy to put it out there for everyone&#039;s amusement and edification.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I catch almost all the Comedy Central and SNL stuff online after the fact. I didn&#8217;t create this flow chart, I am just happy to put it out there for everyone&#8217;s amusement and edification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sarah Palin Debate Flow Chart&#8230; priceless&#8230; by Earl</title>
		<link>http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=306&#038;cpage=1#comment-52870</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 02:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=306#comment-52870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s really funny. Almost as funny as the skit on SNL. If you didn&#039;t get to see it. look it up on YouTube. Tina Fay nails Sarah Palin and the guy doing Biden delivers some funny stuff. Your flow chart just about follows the flow of the SNL skit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s really funny. Almost as funny as the skit on SNL. If you didn&#8217;t get to see it. look it up on YouTube. Tina Fay nails Sarah Palin and the guy doing Biden delivers some funny stuff. Your flow chart just about follows the flow of the SNL skit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Palin/Couric interview &#8211; complete with &#8220;cringe moments&#8221; by Mikael</title>
		<link>http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=304&#038;cpage=1#comment-52750</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=304#comment-52750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This, from Robert Wexler:

~~~

Dear Mikael,

Finally, the cold hard truth is coming out:  Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and the Bush Justice Department fired people for blatantly partisan purposes - breaking the law and injecting politics into our justice system. (A system which can only function in a democracy when it is free from partisan corruption.) 

It is sad that none of us are the least bit surprised.  This week, Glenn Fine, the Inspector General, assigned to investigate the politicization of the Justice Department released a critically important 392 page report.

In it, he stated they found &quot;significant evidence that political partisan considerations were an important factor in the removal of several of the U.S. attorneys.&quot;  Remember, this report comes from Bush&#039;s own Justice Department investigation. Imagine the scathing report that would come from a fully nonpartisan source.

The report also stated Alberto Gonzales, his chief of staff Kyle Sampson, and his deputy Paul McNulty failed &quot;to provide accurate and truthful statements about the removals and their role in the process.&quot;  This is a polite way to say that Gonzales and Sampson lied to investigators.  This is unacceptable, and Gonzales, Sampson, and Rove should face criminal charges for this this behavior.

The report also stated that one of the US attorneys, David Iglesias, was removed &quot;without any inquiry into his handling of the cases.&quot;

The report is so damning of Alberto Gonzales, Rove, Miers, and others that the current Attorney General, Michael Mukasey, has appointed a Special Prosecutor to investigate and, if warranted, issue criminal charges.

Whether this is the beginning of real accountability remains to be seen, but it is my mission to try to make sure Congress does not abdicate its responsibility to do its own investigations.

~~~

Robert Wexler is an American hero.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This, from Robert Wexler:</p>
<p>~~~</p>
<p>Dear Mikael,</p>
<p>Finally, the cold hard truth is coming out:  Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and the Bush Justice Department fired people for blatantly partisan purposes &#8211; breaking the law and injecting politics into our justice system. (A system which can only function in a democracy when it is free from partisan corruption.) </p>
<p>It is sad that none of us are the least bit surprised.  This week, Glenn Fine, the Inspector General, assigned to investigate the politicization of the Justice Department released a critically important 392 page report.</p>
<p>In it, he stated they found &#8220;significant evidence that political partisan considerations were an important factor in the removal of several of the U.S. attorneys.&#8221;  Remember, this report comes from Bush&#8217;s own Justice Department investigation. Imagine the scathing report that would come from a fully nonpartisan source.</p>
<p>The report also stated Alberto Gonzales, his chief of staff Kyle Sampson, and his deputy Paul McNulty failed &#8220;to provide accurate and truthful statements about the removals and their role in the process.&#8221;  This is a polite way to say that Gonzales and Sampson lied to investigators.  This is unacceptable, and Gonzales, Sampson, and Rove should face criminal charges for this this behavior.</p>
<p>The report also stated that one of the US attorneys, David Iglesias, was removed &#8220;without any inquiry into his handling of the cases.&#8221;</p>
<p>The report is so damning of Alberto Gonzales, Rove, Miers, and others that the current Attorney General, Michael Mukasey, has appointed a Special Prosecutor to investigate and, if warranted, issue criminal charges.</p>
<p>Whether this is the beginning of real accountability remains to be seen, but it is my mission to try to make sure Congress does not abdicate its responsibility to do its own investigations.</p>
<p>~~~</p>
<p>Robert Wexler is an American hero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Palin/Couric interview &#8211; complete with &#8220;cringe moments&#8221; by Mikael</title>
		<link>http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=304&#038;cpage=1#comment-52746</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=304#comment-52746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, and...

I meant the compliment. There are so many abusive, ranting, nonsensical idealogues online pretending they can make sense out of national politics and I have gotten very short on patience with them.

It is refreshing to dialogue over simple differences of opinion like adults.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and&#8230;</p>
<p>I meant the compliment. There are so many abusive, ranting, nonsensical idealogues online pretending they can make sense out of national politics and I have gotten very short on patience with them.</p>
<p>It is refreshing to dialogue over simple differences of opinion like adults.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Palin/Couric interview &#8211; complete with &#8220;cringe moments&#8221; by Mikael</title>
		<link>http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=304&#038;cpage=1#comment-52745</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=304#comment-52745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earl,

I am actually against abortion in almost all cases, but feel that ultimately it will always be up to the woman who is pregnant. There is nothing anyone can do to manipulate her choices. The best way to prevent abortion is through wide open sex education and the truth about what an abortion does - ending a life separate from the mother, full access to birth control and creating a culture that respects and tends to the needs of single Moms so that they know they have options.

I looked it up while writing last night and it was my understanding that the &quot;Morning After Pill&quot; actually does prevent conception, it doesn&#039;t end a life. Here is what I found:

http://www.morningafterpill.org/

After reading some more today, it seems that sometime contraception is achieved before a pregnancy and sometimes a fertilized egg is killed, so she and I and you are all a bit off the mark. I hope to learn more. Does this make sense to you?:

http://www.morningafterpill.org/how-does-it-work.html

Katie Couric handled Palin like a cupcake. She couldn&#039;t have been more gentle, yet professional. Palin simply dodged any issue she didn&#039;t want to talk about, didn&#039;t understand or knew her answers wouldn&#039;t play well. It was embarrassing.

I would have a difficult time writing a positive article about Obama and Biden. I prefer them to McCain/Palin by a long shot, but am still very disappointed with Obama&#039;s corporate coziness and general lack of backbone when it comes to strong choices on critical issues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earl,</p>
<p>I am actually against abortion in almost all cases, but feel that ultimately it will always be up to the woman who is pregnant. There is nothing anyone can do to manipulate her choices. The best way to prevent abortion is through wide open sex education and the truth about what an abortion does &#8211; ending a life separate from the mother, full access to birth control and creating a culture that respects and tends to the needs of single Moms so that they know they have options.</p>
<p>I looked it up while writing last night and it was my understanding that the &#8220;Morning After Pill&#8221; actually does prevent conception, it doesn&#8217;t end a life. Here is what I found:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.morningafterpill.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.morningafterpill.org/</a></p>
<p>After reading some more today, it seems that sometime contraception is achieved before a pregnancy and sometimes a fertilized egg is killed, so she and I and you are all a bit off the mark. I hope to learn more. Does this make sense to you?:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.morningafterpill.org/how-does-it-work.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.morningafterpill.org/how-does-it-work.html</a></p>
<p>Katie Couric handled Palin like a cupcake. She couldn&#8217;t have been more gentle, yet professional. Palin simply dodged any issue she didn&#8217;t want to talk about, didn&#8217;t understand or knew her answers wouldn&#8217;t play well. It was embarrassing.</p>
<p>I would have a difficult time writing a positive article about Obama and Biden. I prefer them to McCain/Palin by a long shot, but am still very disappointed with Obama&#8217;s corporate coziness and general lack of backbone when it comes to strong choices on critical issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Palin/Couric interview &#8211; complete with &#8220;cringe moments&#8221; by Earl</title>
		<link>http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=304&#038;cpage=1#comment-52744</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impeachforpeace.org/blog/?p=304#comment-52744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, I forgot to apologize for making you miss your bedtime. I&#039;m sure that if you&#039;re anything like me, you need your beauty sleep.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I forgot to apologize for making you miss your bedtime. I&#8217;m sure that if you&#8217;re anything like me, you need your beauty sleep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
