It is because there is no reason to respond to your FAUXNews-addled brain’s 19%er nonsense. You haven’t said anything of substance, why should I respond? What did you offer that could possibly be interpreted as a rational, reasonable intellectual thought that would be worth challenging?
If your next comment again lacks content, it will be deleted.
Nav = Nonsense.
Comment by Mikael — April 7, 2008 @ 8:52 pm
Wow, I was expecting an articulate slam of substance but all I got was a moonbat polite dismissal.
Is it because the floor is starting to crawl with little bugs and the walls are closing in?
Nav = Nonsense.
Troll Mata Hari sez:
“This is my last post.”
HOORAY!!!
Mikael, do you in fact have bylaws for your organization? And if so, they should be available to the public, shouldn’t they?
Mikhail,
After reading about your efforts I find you unrecognizable as a patriot but allied with the enemy of humanity, radical Islam.
You are doing the dirty work for them.
And … A Walk Against Military Madness might be effective if the real enemy were as naive as your peace marchers.
Why don’t you promote a Walk for Drilling for Oil in America?
If it weren’t for liberal moonbats we wouldn’t be in the middle east. People like you created the schism and bank rolled a skewed, genocidal, radical killing force from which there is no retreat. Our enemy is not Bush but those who would kill us because people like you forced the U.S. to drill for oil over there and not over here.
Regardless, this is America. Until the liberals finish neutering America and create complete and udder chaos in our streets … you have the right to pursue your dogma …. Because there are real men and women defending this right for you.
Nav
You’ve answered my questions.
Thank You.
Yes
“Anyone can purchase a .org, silly, that means nothing.”
Again Thanks! Nothing Indeed!
That’s all I need!
This is my last post.
Troll Mata Hari,
Thank you for your concern. We have done everything necessary to maintain legal status with the IRS and will continue to do so.
You can focus your attention on other matters.
Anyone can purchase a .org, silly, that means nothing.
You are such funny little troll. So demanding! So self-deluded into thinking you can manipulate others into doing your bidding.
Oh, my mistake. You’re not a 501(C)3?
I guess the .org part of impeachforpeace.org
MUST BE FOR SOME OTHER TAX EXEMPT STATUS.
That means you have to be a 501(C)4.
Post your by-laws.
Troll Mark Logan,
You are back to snipe again, are you?
What is your accusation exactly?
If you don’t have anything to say, your posts will be deleted. Take time to compose a coherent thought before returning please.
Mikael quoth: “…Our main mission is to expose governmental corruption and disastrous policies.”
Would that be your mission, or your World Can’t Wait handlers mission?
-Mark
“Genius” Mata Hari stated:
“This is not a 501(3)C operation.”
You are correct. We are not a 501(3)C operation. Congratulations. We never applied for that designation.
And yes, I do occasionally support political candidates openly on this website when I am expressing my own views in the comments section or on my blog. ImpeachforPeace itself does not support any candidates, only causes and points of view. Our main mission is to expose governmental corruption and disastrous policies.
“You support political candidates openly on this website.”
No, we don’t as an organization and never have. The comment sections are fair ground for any individual in or out of the organization to express their opinions. You will find hundreds of posts favoring a hugely diverse list of candidates.
I am sorry you still cannot comprehend the simple distinction between what is expressed by any individuals posting in the comment sections and what is endorsed by IFP.
Maybe you can find a high school graduate to explain the difference for you.
You’re nothing but a moral relatavist that can’t comprehend one simple fact.
You support political candidates openly on this website.
What you “personally express” is actually partisan political support. Lie andt try as you have to blur that distinction with babble, it’s still crystal clear…..
This is not a 501(3)C operation.
This is not a “non-partisan” website.
It’s not 19% but 100% biased political electioneering and needs an audit just like Jeremiah Wright.
19%er Bush-worshiping Troll “Mata Hari”,
Why is it that all you trolls lack the courage to actually identify yourselves by name?
Simple minds always settle on simplistic solutions. I know thinking is hard work, so I don’t expect much more from Bush worshipers.
“… post your by-laws.”
I think what this site represents is fairly obvious, although it appears to be a bit complicated for you to come to terms with.
“You hate Bush.”
Simple mind coming to a simple conclusion. I don’t hate Bush as much as I pity him personally for his lack of principles, compassion and humanity. I hate his policies, his lack of integrity, his lack of any moral compass and hypocritical adoption of the label: “Christian” with zero commitment to or understanding of the teachings of Jesus Christ.
“You hate the military.”
Simple mind coming to a simple conclusion. I don’t hate the military as much as I greatly resent the military I support being demeaned by being utilized as the drivers and gunmen on an oil heist and their being ordered to commit war crimes by their superiors FROM THE TOP DOWN.
” … supporting a group that wants to close down a defense contractor.”
Simple mind coming to a a simple conclusion. The truth is much more nuanced and complicated. Anyone capable of complex thought can easily see that. I completely support WAMM’s call to hold these war profiteers accountable for their production of weapons systems that are violations of Geneva Accords and for their lobbying push for further profit on the blood of innocent Iraqi people for oil.
“You support unilateral disarmament.”
Simple mind making a simple assumption. I, in fact, do not.
“And you support Wexler.”
I personally and we as an organization support Wexler’s patriotic push to initiate impeachment investigations into felonious and treasonous Vice President Dick Cheney.
“As a matter of fact when you go to sign his petition, it takes you directly to his campaign website and asks for a contribution. That makes you a liar.”
No, it most certainly does not. Your accusation reveals you to be only capable of constructing a straw man argument, falsely calling it my position, knocking it down and then beating your chest like Tarzan, claiming a specious victory.
“You supported Kucinich’s campaign…again, tell me when you didn’t.”
I am personally a major fan of Representative Kucinich, and we as an organization are 100% supportive of his impeachment and other accountability work. I am sorry that you are incapable of understanding the subtle difference between my personal preferences and the official support restrictions embraced by ImpeachforPeace.org.
“You support Obama.”
Of the three remaining major candidates I prefer Obama. He was not my first choice, but he is my preference now. Try really, really hard to understand that there is a difference between the preferences I personally express and the fact that the organization I helped found does not support any candidates for office. It really isn’t that complicated. I am sorry, again, that this distinction is causing you so much consternation.
“You support Democrats.”
In many cases, yes I do. Over the last decade, however, I have voted for candidates from at least four different parties. At this point in American history, with the degree to which the Republican Party has compromised itself – selling out 100% to corporate interests over everything and anything that benefits the vast majority of the American people – I wouldn’t vote for a Republican with a gun to my head.
That said, Republican Governor Charlie Crist of Florida proved himself to be capable of doing the right thing by bringing major needed election reforms to his state after succeeding corrupt Bush Crime Family brother Jeb.
Now and then Arlen Specter wakes up for a few moments, sets aside the mental illness of his usual blind party loyalty and makes a decision that reveals a still breathing moral compass. Within a day or two he usually is pressured to get back into lockstep, but at least there is a smidgen of cognitive dissonance still alive in his cerebral cortex.
Ron Paul, whose politics I disagree with for the most part, is someone who tells the truth and refuses to drink the GOP kool-aid and wear the GOP brown shirt of abject loyalty.
There are exceptions, but they are far and few between.
I have also been highly critical and our organization has been extremely critical of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, John Conyers, Jr. and other national Democratic Party leaders for their lack of integrity and misplaced priorities in refusing to hold the Bush Administration accountable for their War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity and the NeoCon-led comprehensive attack on the U. S. Constitution.
When my freshman Senator Amy Klobuchar joined the GOP Fascists in voting to strip away even more of my (and your… in case you care) 4th Amendment rights I publicly called for her resignation in an article posted on multiple websites and read in a video I posted on YouTube.
“You are nothing but a DFL hack and promoter.”
No, I’m most certainly not…
… but I can understand how you are unfortunately incapable of comprehending that very, very simple fact.
Then post your by-laws.
Lobbyists?
You hate Bush. That’s a fact
You hate the military. That’s a fact.
If you didn’t you wouldn’t be supporting a group that wants to close down a defense contractor.
You support unilateral disarmament. There’s nothing more dangerous of an idea. Like Iran, China, Russia, and anybody else would follow suit. A fool’s dream.
And you support Wexler. As a matter of fact when you go to sign his petition, it takes you directly to his campaign website and asks for a contribution. That makes you a liar.
You supported Kucinich’s campaign…again, tell me when you didn’t.
You support Obama. That’s a fact.
You support Democrats. That’s a fact.
Admit it. You are nothing but a DFL hack and promoter.
Troll Mata Hari,
19%er, flatearther, loyal Bushie,
I am not a spokesperson for WAMM, but it is safe to assume that they raise money to make protest signs, flyers to distribute, pay for newspaper ads and radio ads publicizing their events and to pay for airline tickets for lobbyists they send to DC, etc. It takes money to effectively run any organization and WAMM isn’t going to get corporate donations from the sort of sources that you as a loyal Bushie would support instead.
Once again you attack the messenger with illogical fantasy accusations because you have nothing of substance with which to criticize. WAMM is right, and you know it, so you simply attack them for “smelling like hippies” and “being communists”. If you really believed they were wrong, you would list statistics as to why we need to spend every single dollar on our military instead of the education of our children, healthcare, rebuilding the national infrastructure, etc. You don’t because you know you are wrong.
“What does this march hope to accomplish? Something vague like “awareness”?”
Yes. Something you wouldn’t understand, like awareness and education.
This website is not limited in what topics it can post articles on. You lack an understanding of what constraints our tax status places upon us. As an organization we cannot support individual candidates for office or support political parties. Those are our limitations and we keep to them.
Dear Patriot Mikael….
Both Peachie and I asked you where is the money for this march going and you haven’t the slightest clue so you make personal attacks.
Is the money going to be used for terrorizing the people who work at ATK? Don’t they have a legal right to work? Are you trying to intimidate your fellow gainfully employed taxpaying Minnesotans?
Aren’t you an agitator along with the rest of these “marchers”?
Maybe the money is going to be laundered into the Obama campaign…maybe Hillary’s campaign?
Who knows?
Or is it for administrative costs? If so, do men work at WAMM, or does WAMM discriminate on the basis of gender? What is it that WAMM produces besides agitation?
What does this march hope to accomplish? Something vague like “awareness”?
What does this march have to do with impeachment? It doesn’t, does it? Wouldn’t that be in violation of your 501(3)C status with the IRS? Since this march is not about impeachment, you might want to consider removing this article.
Do you have an answer to any of the questions asked of you?
Anything?
Anything at all?
Mikael, you forgot to add, “Do you have any of substance to contribute to the debate? Anything? Anything at all?”
You say you welcome debate, but that’s not possible when you attack anyone who isn’t 110 percent in your camp. And I have yet to see anyone here who’s on your side. You haven’t even tried to defend your position, mainly because there’s nothing to defend. Obviously your movement is dead, or you wouldn’t be reduced to hurling insults at “trolls” all by yourself. Don’t you have anyone else, Mikael?
Anyone?
Anyone at all?
And thank you, I’m proud to be an agitator!
[One more entry from Troll Peachie without anything to say about anything. Not a single issue discussed, not a single original thought to share.]
Add one more comment to the empty Peachie posting legacy.
Your record perfectly reflects the Bush at whose feet you worship.
Oh, but I am like Mother Jones!
How many consecutive posts is that for you Mata Hari without saying anything pertinent to the subject at hand? 4? 5?
Do you have anything to say at all?
Anything at all?
Anything?
Nobody is laughing.
Mikael hatez womyn.
I am not a “troll”
I am a Fair Witness.
Grok?
The trolls slither in…
Anything on the issues to discuss or are you here to simply criticize the patriotic messengers of hope and freedom from corporate control of our government?
Comparing Peachie Troll’s consistent attacks on anything and everything on this site (without ever suggesting any alternative means to improve the nation, of course) to luminaries such at Luther, King, Adams, etc. is laughable.
What’s wrong being an agitator?
Mother Jones was an agitator.
Martin Luther was an agitator
Martin Luther King, Jr. was an agitator.
John Adams was an agitator and so was his cousin Sam.
Is there shame in that?
Peachie, you are just an agitator on this thread as usual. Your only purpose is to debase and smear any and every patriot effort to bring accountability to the government and to corporate entities.
Do you have anything to add to the public discourse? Anything at all? Anything?
Oh, I see. “Don’t ask questions, just shut up and give us your money.” So much for trying to make an informed decision in these tough economic times. Thanks for clearing that up, Mikael!
Who is handling the money? Norman Hsu? Howard Dean?
Nice disclaimer! I’d hate to see somebody get leg cramps or a sprained ankle, hire a ACLU or NLG trial lawyer and sue WAMM. That would be a tragedy. Let’s make it interesting. Have everybody who is marching put on a 60 pound field pack and march the 5 miles like the brave members of our military have been trained to do.
No thanks, that’s Memorial Day weekend. I’ll be doing what’s proper. Tending the graves of loved ones who served and defended this country so self absorbed moonbats can have the freedom to march around and make complete jackasses of themselves.
Why do you want to get rid of your neighbor’s jobs? Isn’t there actual human beings employed at ATK? Ohhhh…they make the tools that the military uses in defending this freedom to march around like disgruntled leftover hippies from the 1960’s.
Why not a bake sale like the dippy poster all you hippies adore?
Marching? That sounds militaristic to me.
Make sure you get Graham Nash to sing “Military Madness”. It was a big hit in 1971.
Right on! Power to the People!
Ultimately the bigger question is: “Why am I Peachie?”. “If I weren’t Peachie would I be an actual human being?”. “If my goal would be to express as much nonsense as possible and pretend I had a point to make along the way other than distracting from any meaningful point would that be the point or would I continue to be pointless?”
To be or not to be Peachie… is that the question? Whether ’tis nobler to express my viewpoint directly or to duck and hide behind the cover of innuendo and distraction instead?
And wither thou goest, Chubby? As is proven that kelpies travel in packs, isn’t a Huggies visit due?
I don’t understand what the money is for. Is this just a fundraiser for WAMM? Also, how do I know how much money to ask for? Aren’t the sponsors supposed to pledge a certain amount of money for every mile I walk? In which case, how can I know in advance how far I’ll walk before I elect to take one of those carbon-emitting shuttles to the finish line (which would sort of defeat the whole purpose of doing this, then it would be “Shuttling Against Weapons” or maybe “Emitting Carbons Against Weapoons”).
Also, what do they mean “in case of rain”? They won’t do this in the rain? Why bother showing up at all? Seems to me they just want money, and once they have it, they don’t care if you show up to walk or shuttle or do cartwheels.
No Nav,
It is because there is no reason to respond to your FAUXNews-addled brain’s 19%er nonsense. You haven’t said anything of substance, why should I respond? What did you offer that could possibly be interpreted as a rational, reasonable intellectual thought that would be worth challenging?
If your next comment again lacks content, it will be deleted.
Nav = Nonsense.
Comment by Mikael — April 7, 2008 @ 8:52 pm
Wow, I was expecting an articulate slam of substance but all I got was a moonbat polite dismissal.
Is it because the floor is starting to crawl with little bugs and the walls are closing in?
Nav = Nonsense.
Troll Mata Hari sez:
“This is my last post.”
HOORAY!!!
Mikael, do you in fact have bylaws for your organization? And if so, they should be available to the public, shouldn’t they?
Mikhail,
After reading about your efforts I find you unrecognizable as a patriot but allied with the enemy of humanity, radical Islam.
You are doing the dirty work for them.
And … A Walk Against Military Madness might be effective if the real enemy were as naive as your peace marchers.
Why don’t you promote a Walk for Drilling for Oil in America?
If it weren’t for liberal moonbats we wouldn’t be in the middle east. People like you created the schism and bank rolled a skewed, genocidal, radical killing force from which there is no retreat. Our enemy is not Bush but those who would kill us because people like you forced the U.S. to drill for oil over there and not over here.
Regardless, this is America. Until the liberals finish neutering America and create complete and udder chaos in our streets … you have the right to pursue your dogma …. Because there are real men and women defending this right for you.
Nav
You’ve answered my questions.
Thank You.
Yes
“Anyone can purchase a .org, silly, that means nothing.”
Again Thanks! Nothing Indeed!
That’s all I need!
This is my last post.
Troll Mata Hari,
Thank you for your concern. We have done everything necessary to maintain legal status with the IRS and will continue to do so.
You can focus your attention on other matters.
Anyone can purchase a .org, silly, that means nothing.
You are such funny little troll. So demanding! So self-deluded into thinking you can manipulate others into doing your bidding.
Oh, my mistake. You’re not a 501(C)3?
I guess the .org part of impeachforpeace.org
MUST BE FOR SOME OTHER TAX EXEMPT STATUS.
That means you have to be a 501(C)4.
Post your by-laws.
Troll Mark Logan,
You are back to snipe again, are you?
What is your accusation exactly?
If you don’t have anything to say, your posts will be deleted. Take time to compose a coherent thought before returning please.
Mikael quoth: “…Our main mission is to expose governmental corruption and disastrous policies.”
Would that be your mission, or your World Can’t Wait handlers mission?
-Mark
“Genius” Mata Hari stated:
“This is not a 501(3)C operation.”
You are correct. We are not a 501(3)C operation. Congratulations. We never applied for that designation.
And yes, I do occasionally support political candidates openly on this website when I am expressing my own views in the comments section or on my blog. ImpeachforPeace itself does not support any candidates, only causes and points of view. Our main mission is to expose governmental corruption and disastrous policies.
“You support political candidates openly on this website.”
No, we don’t as an organization and never have. The comment sections are fair ground for any individual in or out of the organization to express their opinions. You will find hundreds of posts favoring a hugely diverse list of candidates.
I am sorry you still cannot comprehend the simple distinction between what is expressed by any individuals posting in the comment sections and what is endorsed by IFP.
Maybe you can find a high school graduate to explain the difference for you.
You’re nothing but a moral relatavist that can’t comprehend one simple fact.
You support political candidates openly on this website.
What you “personally express” is actually partisan political support. Lie andt try as you have to blur that distinction with babble, it’s still crystal clear…..
This is not a 501(3)C operation.
This is not a “non-partisan” website.
It’s not 19% but 100% biased political electioneering and needs an audit just like Jeremiah Wright.
19%er Bush-worshiping Troll “Mata Hari”,
Why is it that all you trolls lack the courage to actually identify yourselves by name?
Simple minds always settle on simplistic solutions. I know thinking is hard work, so I don’t expect much more from Bush worshipers.
“… post your by-laws.”
I think what this site represents is fairly obvious, although it appears to be a bit complicated for you to come to terms with.
“You hate Bush.”
Simple mind coming to a simple conclusion. I don’t hate Bush as much as I pity him personally for his lack of principles, compassion and humanity. I hate his policies, his lack of integrity, his lack of any moral compass and hypocritical adoption of the label: “Christian” with zero commitment to or understanding of the teachings of Jesus Christ.
“You hate the military.”
Simple mind coming to a simple conclusion. I don’t hate the military as much as I greatly resent the military I support being demeaned by being utilized as the drivers and gunmen on an oil heist and their being ordered to commit war crimes by their superiors FROM THE TOP DOWN.
” … supporting a group that wants to close down a defense contractor.”
Simple mind coming to a a simple conclusion. The truth is much more nuanced and complicated. Anyone capable of complex thought can easily see that. I completely support WAMM’s call to hold these war profiteers accountable for their production of weapons systems that are violations of Geneva Accords and for their lobbying push for further profit on the blood of innocent Iraqi people for oil.
“You support unilateral disarmament.”
Simple mind making a simple assumption. I, in fact, do not.
“And you support Wexler.”
I personally and we as an organization support Wexler’s patriotic push to initiate impeachment investigations into felonious and treasonous Vice President Dick Cheney.
“As a matter of fact when you go to sign his petition, it takes you directly to his campaign website and asks for a contribution. That makes you a liar.”
No, it most certainly does not. Your accusation reveals you to be only capable of constructing a straw man argument, falsely calling it my position, knocking it down and then beating your chest like Tarzan, claiming a specious victory.
“You supported Kucinich’s campaign…again, tell me when you didn’t.”
I am personally a major fan of Representative Kucinich, and we as an organization are 100% supportive of his impeachment and other accountability work. I am sorry that you are incapable of understanding the subtle difference between my personal preferences and the official support restrictions embraced by ImpeachforPeace.org.
“You support Obama.”
Of the three remaining major candidates I prefer Obama. He was not my first choice, but he is my preference now. Try really, really hard to understand that there is a difference between the preferences I personally express and the fact that the organization I helped found does not support any candidates for office. It really isn’t that complicated. I am sorry, again, that this distinction is causing you so much consternation.
“You support Democrats.”
In many cases, yes I do. Over the last decade, however, I have voted for candidates from at least four different parties. At this point in American history, with the degree to which the Republican Party has compromised itself – selling out 100% to corporate interests over everything and anything that benefits the vast majority of the American people – I wouldn’t vote for a Republican with a gun to my head.
That said, Republican Governor Charlie Crist of Florida proved himself to be capable of doing the right thing by bringing major needed election reforms to his state after succeeding corrupt Bush Crime Family brother Jeb.
Now and then Arlen Specter wakes up for a few moments, sets aside the mental illness of his usual blind party loyalty and makes a decision that reveals a still breathing moral compass. Within a day or two he usually is pressured to get back into lockstep, but at least there is a smidgen of cognitive dissonance still alive in his cerebral cortex.
Ron Paul, whose politics I disagree with for the most part, is someone who tells the truth and refuses to drink the GOP kool-aid and wear the GOP brown shirt of abject loyalty.
There are exceptions, but they are far and few between.
I have also been highly critical and our organization has been extremely critical of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, John Conyers, Jr. and other national Democratic Party leaders for their lack of integrity and misplaced priorities in refusing to hold the Bush Administration accountable for their War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity and the NeoCon-led comprehensive attack on the U. S. Constitution.
When my freshman Senator Amy Klobuchar joined the GOP Fascists in voting to strip away even more of my (and your… in case you care) 4th Amendment rights I publicly called for her resignation in an article posted on multiple websites and read in a video I posted on YouTube.
“You are nothing but a DFL hack and promoter.”
No, I’m most certainly not…
… but I can understand how you are unfortunately incapable of comprehending that very, very simple fact.
Then post your by-laws.
Lobbyists?
You hate Bush. That’s a fact
You hate the military. That’s a fact.
If you didn’t you wouldn’t be supporting a group that wants to close down a defense contractor.
You support unilateral disarmament. There’s nothing more dangerous of an idea. Like Iran, China, Russia, and anybody else would follow suit. A fool’s dream.
And you support Wexler. As a matter of fact when you go to sign his petition, it takes you directly to his campaign website and asks for a contribution. That makes you a liar.
You supported Kucinich’s campaign…again, tell me when you didn’t.
You support Obama. That’s a fact.
You support Democrats. That’s a fact.
Admit it. You are nothing but a DFL hack and promoter.
Troll Mata Hari,
19%er, flatearther, loyal Bushie,
I am not a spokesperson for WAMM, but it is safe to assume that they raise money to make protest signs, flyers to distribute, pay for newspaper ads and radio ads publicizing their events and to pay for airline tickets for lobbyists they send to DC, etc. It takes money to effectively run any organization and WAMM isn’t going to get corporate donations from the sort of sources that you as a loyal Bushie would support instead.
Once again you attack the messenger with illogical fantasy accusations because you have nothing of substance with which to criticize. WAMM is right, and you know it, so you simply attack them for “smelling like hippies” and “being communists”. If you really believed they were wrong, you would list statistics as to why we need to spend every single dollar on our military instead of the education of our children, healthcare, rebuilding the national infrastructure, etc. You don’t because you know you are wrong.
“What does this march hope to accomplish? Something vague like “awareness”?”
Yes. Something you wouldn’t understand, like awareness and education.
This website is not limited in what topics it can post articles on. You lack an understanding of what constraints our tax status places upon us. As an organization we cannot support individual candidates for office or support political parties. Those are our limitations and we keep to them.
Dear Patriot Mikael….
Both Peachie and I asked you where is the money for this march going and you haven’t the slightest clue so you make personal attacks.
Is the money going to be used for terrorizing the people who work at ATK? Don’t they have a legal right to work? Are you trying to intimidate your fellow gainfully employed taxpaying Minnesotans?
Aren’t you an agitator along with the rest of these “marchers”?
Maybe the money is going to be laundered into the Obama campaign…maybe Hillary’s campaign?
Who knows?
Or is it for administrative costs? If so, do men work at WAMM, or does WAMM discriminate on the basis of gender? What is it that WAMM produces besides agitation?
What does this march hope to accomplish? Something vague like “awareness”?
What does this march have to do with impeachment? It doesn’t, does it? Wouldn’t that be in violation of your 501(3)C status with the IRS? Since this march is not about impeachment, you might want to consider removing this article.
Do you have an answer to any of the questions asked of you?
Anything?
Anything at all?
Mikael, you forgot to add, “Do you have any of substance to contribute to the debate? Anything? Anything at all?”
You say you welcome debate, but that’s not possible when you attack anyone who isn’t 110 percent in your camp. And I have yet to see anyone here who’s on your side. You haven’t even tried to defend your position, mainly because there’s nothing to defend. Obviously your movement is dead, or you wouldn’t be reduced to hurling insults at “trolls” all by yourself. Don’t you have anyone else, Mikael?
Anyone?
Anyone at all?
And thank you, I’m proud to be an agitator!
[One more entry from Troll Peachie without anything to say about anything. Not a single issue discussed, not a single original thought to share.]
Add one more comment to the empty Peachie posting legacy.
Your record perfectly reflects the Bush at whose feet you worship.
Oh, but I am like Mother Jones!
How many consecutive posts is that for you Mata Hari without saying anything pertinent to the subject at hand? 4? 5?
Do you have anything to say at all?
Anything at all?
Anything?
Nobody is laughing.
Mikael hatez womyn.
I am not a “troll”
I am a Fair Witness.
Grok?
The trolls slither in…
Anything on the issues to discuss or are you here to simply criticize the patriotic messengers of hope and freedom from corporate control of our government?
Comparing Peachie Troll’s consistent attacks on anything and everything on this site (without ever suggesting any alternative means to improve the nation, of course) to luminaries such at Luther, King, Adams, etc. is laughable.
What’s wrong being an agitator?
Mother Jones was an agitator.
Martin Luther was an agitator
Martin Luther King, Jr. was an agitator.
John Adams was an agitator and so was his cousin Sam.
Is there shame in that?
Peachie, you are just an agitator on this thread as usual. Your only purpose is to debase and smear any and every patriot effort to bring accountability to the government and to corporate entities.
Do you have anything to add to the public discourse? Anything at all? Anything?
Oh, I see. “Don’t ask questions, just shut up and give us your money.” So much for trying to make an informed decision in these tough economic times. Thanks for clearing that up, Mikael!
Who is handling the money? Norman Hsu? Howard Dean?
Nice disclaimer! I’d hate to see somebody get leg cramps or a sprained ankle, hire a ACLU or NLG trial lawyer and sue WAMM. That would be a tragedy. Let’s make it interesting. Have everybody who is marching put on a 60 pound field pack and march the 5 miles like the brave members of our military have been trained to do.
No thanks, that’s Memorial Day weekend. I’ll be doing what’s proper. Tending the graves of loved ones who served and defended this country so self absorbed moonbats can have the freedom to march around and make complete jackasses of themselves.
Why do you want to get rid of your neighbor’s jobs? Isn’t there actual human beings employed at ATK? Ohhhh…they make the tools that the military uses in defending this freedom to march around like disgruntled leftover hippies from the 1960’s.
Why not a bake sale like the dippy poster all you hippies adore?
Marching? That sounds militaristic to me.
Make sure you get Graham Nash to sing “Military Madness”. It was a big hit in 1971.
Right on! Power to the People!
Ultimately the bigger question is: “Why am I Peachie?”. “If I weren’t Peachie would I be an actual human being?”. “If my goal would be to express as much nonsense as possible and pretend I had a point to make along the way other than distracting from any meaningful point would that be the point or would I continue to be pointless?”
To be or not to be Peachie… is that the question? Whether ’tis nobler to express my viewpoint directly or to duck and hide behind the cover of innuendo and distraction instead?
And wither thou goest, Chubby? As is proven that kelpies travel in packs, isn’t a Huggies visit due?
I don’t understand what the money is for. Is this just a fundraiser for WAMM? Also, how do I know how much money to ask for? Aren’t the sponsors supposed to pledge a certain amount of money for every mile I walk? In which case, how can I know in advance how far I’ll walk before I elect to take one of those carbon-emitting shuttles to the finish line (which would sort of defeat the whole purpose of doing this, then it would be “Shuttling Against Weapons” or maybe “Emitting Carbons Against Weapoons”).
Also, what do they mean “in case of rain”? They won’t do this in the rain? Why bother showing up at all? Seems to me they just want money, and once they have it, they don’t care if you show up to walk or shuttle or do cartwheels.