<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Impeach For Peace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog</link>
	<description>Impeach Power Abusing Officials</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:30:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Un-Cheating Justice: Two Years Left to Prosecute Bush by S. Wolf Britain</title>
		<link>http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog/?p=6195&#038;cpage=1#comment-107334</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Wolf Britain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog/?p=6195#comment-107334</guid>
		<description>I thought the War Crimes Act was still in effect. Why does past-NLG president, Marjorie Cohn continue to mention it and its serious-egregious violation(s) if it isn&#039;t? Did the &quot;Patriot Act&quot;, the &quot;Military Commissions Acts&quot; for 2006 and/or 2010, the &quot;John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (NDAA)&quot;, and/or the 2012 NDAA, etc., change all of that, at least concerning the War Crimes Act? I would greatly appreciate some clarification, please. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the War Crimes Act was still in effect. Why does past-NLG president, Marjorie Cohn continue to mention it and its serious-egregious violation(s) if it isn&#8217;t? Did the &#8220;Patriot Act&#8221;, the &#8220;Military Commissions Acts&#8221; for 2006 and/or 2010, the &#8220;John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (NDAA)&#8221;, and/or the 2012 NDAA, etc., change all of that, at least concerning the War Crimes Act? I would greatly appreciate some clarification, please. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Case for Obama&#8217;s Impeachment by S. Wolf Britain</title>
		<link>http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog/?p=6039&#038;cpage=1#comment-107332</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Wolf Britain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 01:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog/?p=6039#comment-107332</guid>
		<description>Excellent article, Dave Lindorff! It&#039;s good to see that at least discussing the possibility of seeking the impeachment of Obama and members of his administration is &quot;on the table&quot;. Now, please, let&#039;s start actually seeking their impeachment, no matter how much ridicule we receive for it, because our duty to the Constitution REQUIRES that we seek it; and, because Obama, et al., are war criminals now like their predecessors, the Constitution also REQUIRES not only that impeachment be sought, but that they in actuality be, AND THAT THEY MUST BE, impeached. Thank you for starting the process of making that clear.

In addition, has this article been submitted to TruthOut.org for publishing yet? Since they won&#039;t seem to touch the subject of the coverup of 9/11 as it is their CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY as Americans and journalists to do, it would (/will?) be interesting to see if they will (yet?) touch THIS matter as well which is also their CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY, and their duty as journalists, to address and help bring about, at-minimum, the seeking of, in addition to helping bring about, said impeachment. TruthOut DOES tell it like it is quite a bit, especially through the articles of Jason Leopold, but they need to do more, much more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article, Dave Lindorff! It&#8217;s good to see that at least discussing the possibility of seeking the impeachment of Obama and members of his administration is &#8220;on the table&#8221;. Now, please, let&#8217;s start actually seeking their impeachment, no matter how much ridicule we receive for it, because our duty to the Constitution REQUIRES that we seek it; and, because Obama, et al., are war criminals now like their predecessors, the Constitution also REQUIRES not only that impeachment be sought, but that they in actuality be, AND THAT THEY MUST BE, impeached. Thank you for starting the process of making that clear.</p>
<p>In addition, has this article been submitted to TruthOut.org for publishing yet? Since they won&#8217;t seem to touch the subject of the coverup of 9/11 as it is their CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY as Americans and journalists to do, it would (/will?) be interesting to see if they will (yet?) touch THIS matter as well which is also their CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY, and their duty as journalists, to address and help bring about, at-minimum, the seeking of, in addition to helping bring about, said impeachment. TruthOut DOES tell it like it is quite a bit, especially through the articles of Jason Leopold, but they need to do more, much more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The People v. Bush &#8211; A New Book by S. Wolf Britain</title>
		<link>http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog/?p=6018&#038;cpage=1#comment-107328</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Wolf Britain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog/?p=6018#comment-107328</guid>
		<description>Jodin, please get with it and begin calling for, and have this site calling for, the impeachment of &quot;O-bomb-thousands-of-people-death&quot;, who is continuing virtually all of the evil, horrific terrorist U.S.-government policies of the Bush administration. O-bomb-a is violating the Constitution, and committing more than impeachable offenses, right and left. We need to start calling for O-bomb-a&#039;s impeachment now, and not wait until a year or two down the road. If you haven&#039;t already considered this, please do so now, and thank you for considering it. Please let me and/or &quot;us&quot; know what your thinking on this matter is, without any of the rationalizations for &quot;being patient with Obama&quot; and/or &quot;giving him time&quot;. Bullpucky! This man and his administration are Constitutional, human rights and war criminals, and they&#039;ve got to go! They&#039;re also continuing the erection of the militarized police state across the U.S., and eradicating our civil liberties and the very Constitution itself. Haven&#039;t you read about O-bomb-a&#039;s &quot;signing statements&quot;---after he swore during his campaign that he would not use signing statements? And that&#039;s just the tip of the iceberg for his continuation of BushCON policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jodin, please get with it and begin calling for, and have this site calling for, the impeachment of &#8220;O-bomb-thousands-of-people-death&#8221;, who is continuing virtually all of the evil, horrific terrorist U.S.-government policies of the Bush administration. O-bomb-a is violating the Constitution, and committing more than impeachable offenses, right and left. We need to start calling for O-bomb-a&#8217;s impeachment now, and not wait until a year or two down the road. If you haven&#8217;t already considered this, please do so now, and thank you for considering it. Please let me and/or &#8220;us&#8221; know what your thinking on this matter is, without any of the rationalizations for &#8220;being patient with Obama&#8221; and/or &#8220;giving him time&#8221;. Bullpucky! This man and his administration are Constitutional, human rights and war criminals, and they&#8217;ve got to go! They&#8217;re also continuing the erection of the militarized police state across the U.S., and eradicating our civil liberties and the very Constitution itself. Haven&#8217;t you read about O-bomb-a&#8217;s &#8220;signing statements&#8221;&#8212;after he swore during his campaign that he would not use signing statements? And that&#8217;s just the tip of the iceberg for his continuation of BushCON policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 87-Year Old NH State Rep Will Not Eat, Willing to Die for Impeachment by Jim_NH</title>
		<link>http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog/?p=4795&#038;cpage=1#comment-107326</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim_NH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog/?p=4795#comment-107326</guid>
		<description>So, when will we start the movement to impeach Obama?  Personally we can rid this country of all career politicians by out vote.  The problem is that people just don&#039;t care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, when will we start the movement to impeach Obama?  Personally we can rid this country of all career politicians by out vote.  The problem is that people just don&#8217;t care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wayne Gilcrest (R-MD) First Republican to sign onto Department of Peace Bill by David Cowan</title>
		<link>http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog/?p=5507&#038;cpage=1#comment-107216</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog/?p=5507#comment-107216</guid>
		<description>Join with us in western Maryland and vote for change this November, Vote for the person who has never been in the office they are running for, and please do not vote for anyone who says they will do the will of the people</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Join with us in western Maryland and vote for change this November, Vote for the person who has never been in the office they are running for, and please do not vote for anyone who says they will do the will of the people</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

