At some point your blind loyalist arguments in defense of these anti-constitutional thugs in the White House will have to mature beyond simply: “Blame Clinton” to be worth being considered potentially legitimate.

first of all, if you are going to impeach Bush on #1 alone, you might as well try Clinton, Reno, and his entire former cabinet for ignoring Al Queda and Bin Ladin up until now.
Second, your “list” contains only a few remotely impeachable offenses, if you can prove complicity on the part of Bush and not Congress, the State Dept, etc. The rest just seem like the personal, irrelevant angry issues I have been hearing Democrats complain about for years. (Not voting for Kyoto? Not admitting us into another “entangling alliance”? Unbelievable! Outrageous! Baby-killer!) I can’t even fathom why Kyoto and “future deaths of millions of people” would even be anywhere near this list. It is things like that that poison moderate and republican support for an action like this. Congressional Democrats and left-wing groups should have learned from the first FOUR TIMES they tried to vote to end the war. Screaming, ranting, and raving not only turns people off to your cause, but quickly polarizes them against you.

Thanks for the continuing rants, sir.

Maybe America herself has become a lame duck.

Impeach Bush? All he did was tell the world Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and profiting from the war against terror. Surely the hundreds of lives sacrificed and plundered is for a good cause. What’s wrong with that?