![\"bishophardhat-kf_nejmabrm.jpg\"](\"https:\/\/impeachforpeace.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/05\/bishophardhat-kf_nejmabrm.thumbnail.jpg\")
Bishop says vote to refer petition to stop Bush complex at SMU is “merely procedural”\n
\nPress Contact Information:
\nRev. Andrew J, Weaver, Ph.D. Brooklyn, NY
\n212-920-9296
\nAWeaver747@aol.com
\nwww.protectSMU.org
\n
\n“The General Conference of the United Methodist Church did receive a petition asking it to block SMU’s decision to lease land for the George W. Bush Presidential Library and Center.
\nIts decision was only to refer it to the South Central Jurisdictional Conference. In no way did it reject the decision already made by the South Central Jurisdiction’s Mission Council.\u00c2\u00a0 The action was merely procedural because the General Conference said the decision belonged at the Jurisdictional level.\u00c2\u00a0 The overwhelming nature of the vote was due to the fact that it, along with 11 other petitions, was on a consent calendar”\u00a6.” (1).\u00c2\u00a0 Scott J. Jones, Bishop, Kansas Area of the United Methodist Church. (Press Statement, May 3, 2008)
\n\u00c2\u00a0
\nUnited Methodist Bishop Scott J. Jones of Kansas has been an outspoken advocate for locating the Bush library and partisan institute at Southern Methodist University (SMU) (2-3). He has also told the press that the right of the South Central Jurisdiction (SCJ) delegates to vote on the use of their church property at SMU will not be honored,\u00c2\u00a0although it is clearly stated in church law that a vote is mandated (4-5).
\nThis appears to continue to be Jones’ position even after an 844-20 vote on a petition calling for the rejection of the Bush project was referred to the SCJ by the highest authority in the UMC “\u201c its General Conference.\u00c2\u00a0 If this vote has no moral or legal force and is, “merely procedural”\u009d, why did General Conference bother bringing it to a vote in the first place?
\nThe petition against the Bush project could have been killed in committee, dozens were, but it passed the important Ministry and Higher Education Committee by a vote of 51 to 5.\u00c2\u00a0 It could have easily been killed on the floor, but it was not. \u00c2\u00a0Instead it was formally referred by a vote of 844-20 to the owners of the SMU property.\u00c2\u00a0
\nBishop Jones told the Dallas Morning News in 2007 that the thousands of fellow United Methodists and SMU alumni who signed a petition (www.protectSMU.org) objecting to Bush partisan think tank “would have no influence”\u009d on him as an SMU trustee.\u00c2\u00a0 Moreover, he declared that SMU “trustees — not the United Methodist Church — have the final say on decisions that SMU makes about the library” (6).\u00c2\u00a0 Bishop Jones made this statement despite the fact that the UMC founded and owns SMU, and the trustees are appointed under the authority of the church.
\nI urge Bishop Jones to reconsider and support the democratic and transparent processes of our church.\u00c2\u00a0 I fear our communion will suffer a lingering and unnecessary wound of distrust, hurt, and anger if there is not fairness on this issue.\u00c2\u00a0 Thousands of United Methodists (see www.protestSMU.org) believe that\u00c2\u00a0honoring and “celebrating”\u009d a glaringly unrepentant UMC member, President George W. Bush, with a partisan think tank, will damage our credibility as followers of Jesus Christ and bring lasting shame upon the our church and a fine university (7).
\n\u00c2\u00a0
\n\u00c2\u00a0
\n(1)www. dallassouthblog.com\/2008\/05\/01\/general-conference-decision-on-bush-library-put-decision-in-hands-of-south-central-jursidiction.
\n\u00c2\u00a0
\n(2)www.nytimes.com\/2008\/01\/30\/us\/30smu.html?_r=1&ex=1202360400&en=b6c2adabd5ad96db&ei=5070&emc=eta1&oref=slogin
\n\u00c2\u00a0
\n(3)www.umc.org\/site\/apps\/nlnet\/content2.aspx?c=lwL4KnN1LtH&b=4097685&content_id={2F430FD7-29F5-42FD-8370-3FDD6FE8E3CB}¬oc=1
\n(4) www.newsblaze.com\/story\/20080130234732nnnn.nb\/topstory.html
\n(5) \u00c2\u00a0www.usnews.com\/blogs\/faith-matters\/2008\/2\/4\/tempest-in-a-texas-teapot.html\u00c2\u00a0 “Reverend David Severe, Director of Mission and Administration for the South Central Jurisdiction, wrote to an SMU professor on October 6, 2007, that ‘All actions taken by the Mission Council interim the Jurisdictional Conference must be ratified by the next Jurisdictional Conference session.’\u00c2\u00a0 “He (Severe) cited church law from the 2004 Jurisdictional Journal: “The Council shall be subject to the following and specific limitations of authority: All actions taken by The Council shall be valid and in full effect within the South Central Jurisdiction until the next regular session of the (Jurisdictional) Conference…. ”
\n(6)www.dallasnews.com\/sharedcontent\/dws\/dn\/latestnews\/stories\/011907dnmetbushmethodist.511bb5f9.html
\n\u00c2\u00a0
\n(7) www.mediatransparency.org\/story.php?storyID=196
\n\u00c2\u00a0
\n\u00c2\u00a0
\nRev. Andrew J. Weaver, Ph.D., is a United Methodist minister and research psychologist living in New York City and\u00c2\u00a0a graduate of Perkins School of Theology, SMU.\u00c2\u00a0 He has co-authored 14 books including: Counseling Survivors of Traumatic Events (Abingdon, 2003) and Reflections on Grief and the Spiritual Journey (Abingdon, 2005).\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0He has made numerous presentations, most recently at the American Psychological Association, the National Association of Jewish Chaplains, the Southern Medical Association,\u00c2\u00a0and the Association of Professional Chaplains.\u00c2\u00a0 On three occasions he was awarded the Templeton Foundation Prize for Exemplary Paper on Religion and Behavioral Science<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"