By Matt Kelley, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON A newly formed consulting firm hired to account for more than $7.3 billion in Iraqi reconstruction money did not deliver a database that could help investigators track waste and fraud, a recent report found.
The result: Two years after uncovering one major fraud case, auditors still haven't determined whether there was more graft in the spending of Iraqi oil proceeds. In April 2005, Stuart Bowen, the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction, recommended creating a database to help review U.S. spending throughout Iraq. The recommendation followed the discovery of an $8.6 million bid-rigging scheme in south-central Iraq. Five months later, a U.S. contracting office in Baghdad hired Reviewer Management International (RMI) of New York to create a database that could link contracts with the officials who authorized them. RMI, however, wasn't given adequate instructions until near the end of its $1.5 million contract and, as a result, didn't deliver a usable database, the inspector general's office found in a follow-up report released Jan. 29. Employees in the Baghdad contracting office took on the project, completed the work and turned over the results to the Iraqi government in December. Bowen promised Congress that his office will investigate further. Air Force Lt. Col. Joe Mazur of the Joint Contracting Command-Iraq said Bowen's report was accurate. He said RMI got a "sole-source contract." Such contracts are awarded without competitive bidding because only one company is considered qualified to do the work quickly enough. Mazur could not comment on the firm's qualifications because he was unable to find a copy of its proposal. Robert Raggio, RMI's chairman and sole officer, did not respond to repeated telephone and e-mail messages seeking comment. The United Nations gave the U.S.-led provisional Iraqi government control over the country's oil proceeds — an account called the Development Fund for Iraq (DFI) —— shortly after the 2003 invasion. U.S. agencies oversaw reconstruction projects using more than $7.3 billion of DFI money through the middle of 2006, U.N. auditors say. In addition, Bowen's office has found U.S. officials transferred $8.8 billion in oil proceeds to interim Iraqi ministries without keeping track of the money. Mismanagement of Iraqi money has angered some Democrats in Congress, who say it may have increased costs for the United States, which has spent $38 billion of taxpayer money on reconstruction. "If this administration could not accomplish these (reconstruction) goals with Iraqi money, how can they be trusted to be good stewards over American taxpayer dollars?" asked Rep. William Lacy Clay, D-Mo., at a House oversight committee hearing in February. Much of the Iraqi oil money spent by the United States was given in bundles of $100 bills to military officials and civilians to quickly pay for small-scale projects, Bowen's office has reported. In 2004, the inspector general began investigating $120 million in cash provided to American officials at a regional reconstruction office in south-central Iraq. That probe led to the largest criminal fraud case in Iraq so far, which resulted in to three guilty pleas and charges against five others. The military hired RMI in September 2005 to compile records of all similar cash transactions made throughout Iraq. Raggio incorporated the firm in Delaware less than seven weeks before getting the contract. State records show he listed the firm's office as a residence in Babylon, N.Y., and its principal place of business as Iraq. Army contracting officials didn't tell RMI until granting a one-month extension to its eight-month contract that it should try "as time permits" to link payment records to the U.S. officials who authorized the spending, the report said. Although the RMI database includes more than 300,000 entries, an unidentified military contracting official is quoted in the report as saying it is "only a collection of records that were not audited or effectively connected to one another."
Conversation guidelines: USA TODAY welcomes your thoughts, stories and information related to this article.
Please stay on topic and be respectful of others. Keep the conversation appropriate for interested readers across the map.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Digg del.icio.us Newsvine Reddit FacebookWhat's this?