bradblog.com
FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds ‘Names’ Names
21 Photos Placed Onto a ‘States Secrets Privilege Gallery’ Page at the ‘Gagged’ Former Translator’s Website…And ‘Everybody Knows’…
Sibel Edmonds is now naming names. 21 of them.
Or rather, just 21 photographs. On a page. Without comment. At her JustACitizen.com website. The page is simply titled “Sibel Edmonds’ State Secrets Privilege Gallery”. (Screenshot at above.)
Surely there’s nothing violative about that, right? Rogues gallery though it may be.
Sibel maven, Luke Ryland, has done us the favor of putting names to the faces, adding that “we can reasonably presume that they are the 21 guilty people in her case.”
Here are those names, sectioned into three groups, as Edmonds has grouped the photos in her own “Gallery”:
Current and former Pentagon and State Department officials…
Richard Perle
Douglas Feith
Eric Edelman
Marc Grossman
Brent Scowcroft
Larry Franklin
Current and former congressmen…
Dennis Hastert (R-IL), Ex-House Speaker
Roy Blount (R-MO)
Dan Burton (R-IN)
Tom Lantos (D-CA)
? (Photo simply a box with question mark in it)
Bob Livingston (R-LA), Ex-House Speaker
Stephen Solarz (D-NY)
The 3rd group includes people who all appear to work at think tanks – primarily WINEP, The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Graham E. Fuller – RAND
David Makovsky – WINEP
Alan Makovsky – WINEP
? (Photo simply a box with question mark in it)
? (Photo simply a box with question mark in it)
Yusuf Turani (President-in-exile, Turkistan)
Professor Sabri Sayari (Georgetown, WINEP)
Mehmet Eymur (Former Turkish Spy Chief MIT)
If you’ve yet to read yesterday’s blockbuster report (and the several updates added throughout the day), please do.
And then, with facts and faces and names in mind…there’s this to ponder over your breakfast, lunch, dinner or nightmare. Also courtesy of the good Mr. Ryland, as originally posted last Summer, if somehow more fitting of late, as the noose begins to tighten…
Congressional Record: WHY CHENEY SHOULD BE IMPEACHED
_____
HON. WM. LACY CLAY of Missouri, Thursday, May 3, 2007
Mr. CLAY. Madam Speaker, I am a proud cosponsor of H. Res. 333, the resolution to Impeach Vice President Dick Cheney. Four years after the start of this war, it is obvious that Mr. Cheney deliberately manipulated the intelligence process to deceive Congress and the American people. At the urging of my constituents in Missouri’s 1st Congressional District, and from Americans across the country, I cosponsored Congressman Kucinich’s resolution because there is ample evidence that Mr. Cheney systematically evaded the truth and used scare tactics to build support for this unjust war. Mr. Cheney’s betrayal has resulted in a tragic, unnecessary war that has already cost the lives of over 3,300 brave Americans and has cost the taxpayers over $400 billion. The Vice President has taken the integrity out of his office and breeched the trust of the American people.
Madam Speaker, below is Richard Cohen’s column from yesterday’s Washington Post, headlined, “A Case Against Cheney.” I agree with Mr. Cohen’s conclusion, “the harping on weapons of mass destruction was an attempt to scare the American people into supporting a war that need not have been fought.” I encourage my colleagues to read this column and make a conscious decision to hold Vice President Cheney accountable by cosponsoring H. Res. 333.
[From the Washington Post, May 2, 2007]
A Case Against Cheney
(By Richard Cohen)
The resolution offered by the gentleman from Ohio reads sensibly. It alleges crimes high and low, misdemeanors galore–all of them representing an effort to mislead the American people and take them into war. It is Dennis Kucinich’s articles of impeachment directed at Dick Cheney. The vice president will, of course, deny being a liar. As long as Kucinich is at it, add that to the articles.
The congressman’s case is persuasive, although his remedy may be too radical. He calls for Cheney to be impeached by the House and tried by the Senate, just as Bill Clinton was for what turned out to be neither a high crime nor much of a misdemeanor. What was it, anyway, compared with more than 3,300 American dead?
In his articles of impeachment, Kucinich details the many statements Cheney made that turned out to be factually wrong. For instance, he quotes Cheney as saying, “We know they [the Iraqis] have biological and chemical weapons,” which of course, they didn’t. Still, that was excusable, since it was early in the game and little contradictory evidence was being presented. As Condi Rice said Sunday, “When George [Tenet] said `slam dunk,’ everybody understood that he believed that the intelligence was strong. We all believed the intelligence was strong.”
But in Cheney’s case, the slam-dunking went on and on–way past the point where it was possible anymore to believe him. He continued to insist that Saddam Hussein had high-level contacts with al-Qaeda–”the evidence is overwhelming,” he once said–while others in the government not only knew that the evidence was not overwhelming but that it hardly existed. It was the same with Cheney’s insistence–not just wrong, but irrefutably so–that Hussein “has weapons of mass destruction,” and “[t]here is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies and against us.” The percussive march of these statements is so forceful, one after another after another, that it suggests Cheney wanted war no matter what. If he was lying to himself as well as to the rest of us, that is only a mitigating circumstance–sort of an insanity defense.
Kucinich also alleges that Cheney “purposely manipulated the intelligence process to deceive the citizens and Congress.” That, as the expression goes, is the gravamen of the charge. Kucinich doesn’t stand a ghost of a chance of making it stick because Congress is not about to vote impeachment. But no one who reads Kucinich’s case against Cheney can fail to conclude that this is a rational, serious accusation. It’s possible that each individual charge can be rebutted, but the essence of it is shockingly apparent: We were being manipulated.
It is something of a joke that Washington is now transfixed by l’affaire Wolfowitz. This is the contretemps at the World Bank in which an architect of this misbegotten war stands accused of favoring his girlfriend. Do not be concerned with the details–this is a parody of a Washington scandal–but concentrate instead on what else Wolfowitz has done in government and how, now, it is a salary increase awarded to a companion that might do him in. This is tantamount to getting Al Capone for tax evasion.
In the same vein, we tend to focus on single events or statements regarding Iraq (to slam dunk or not to slam dunk, that is the question) and how poor George Tenet, a self- deceived careerist, is misunderstood–as if he had uttered a statement of principle dramatically resigning over the manipulation of intelligence and it is suspiciously missing from the record. In all this back-and-forth, what gets lost is the immensity of the outrage, the enormousness of the breach of trust, the naive faith some of us had that when it came to the making of war, we’d be told the truth. This was not the case. The harping on weapons of mass destruction was an attempt to scare the American people into supporting a war that need not have been fought.
Kucinich is an odd guy for whom the killer appellation “perennial presidential candidate” is lethally applied. But he is on to something here. It is easy enough to ad hominize him to the margins–ya know, the skinny guy among the “real” presidential candidates–but at a given moment, and this is one, he’s the only one on that stage who articulates a genuine sense of betrayal. He is not out merely to win the nomination but to hold the Bush administration–particularly Cheney–accountable. In this he will fail. What Cheney has done is not impeachable. It is merely unforgivable.
afterdowningstreet.org
CBS Censors Taking Over Public Parks?
By Anne Pritchett
As some of you know, last Friday the CBS Early Show was here in Kansas City and our group was not allowed to appear in their camera shots holding our signs against the war. As soon as we arrived, a CBS staffer came over and told us they had a permit to use the park and they had the right to decide who could come to their event and who could not come and she wanted us to leave. We asked to see the permit and the CBS lady left and returned with a cop who put us in a free speech zone and then later handcuffed a member of our group who took her OUT OF IRAQ NOW sign into the ‘forbidden’ area.
A local radio show host interviewed the woman who was handcuffed and then called CBS for a statement and their spokeswoman DENIED that we were not allowed to be on their show! She said CBS does not censure political signs. She then asked how we even knew that the woman who asked us to leave worked for CBS!!!
Well I saw her nametag that clearly said ‘CBS’!!! So we know for a fact that CBS asked us to leave a public park because of our political signs.
Signs they did allow on the air included
GO NAVY
SAVE A HORSE, RIDE A COWBOY
Here’s what I am asking. I want CBS DELUGED with letters shaming them for censoring us and our signs. YES, they did try to make us leave a public park and yes, one of us was threatened with arrest. And now they are denying this censorship even happened!!
Filed under: Arizona,California,Florida,Illinois,Impeachment Progress News,Maryland,Massachusetts,Missouri,New York,Ohio,Tennessee,Virginia,Wisconsin — Jodin Morey @ 9:37 am 
ImpeachPac – Congressman Wexler urges support for Cheney Impeachment Hearings
Congressional Record: WHY CHENEY SHOULD BE IMPEACHED
