impeach bush for peace peach
Mikael's Accountability Blog

(Go to our Main Page:ImpeachForPeace.org)

Add to Google

Daily Impeachment News:

December 11, 2007

Kucinich Preparing 50-Page Articles of Impeachment Against Bush

Filed under: Impeachment Progress News, Nevada — Mikael @ 10:41 pm

kucinich.jpgscoop.co.nz
Column: David Swanson

[...]
Those expecting Kucinich to deliver harsh words about the president weren’t disappointed, as the half-hour campaign speech soon turned to talk of impeachment.

“On the way over here, I was reading a 50-page document that relates to Articles of Impeachment for the President of the United States,” Kucinich said to a standing ovation. “And I want you to know that I’m actually preparing this document for submission to the House.”

Kucinich said under the current administration, citizen’s rights to due process and fair trial are in jeopardy.

“This is a moment when we’re called upon to reclaim our country,” he said. “You give me your vote, I’ll give you back your country.”

(Original Article)


October 8, 2007

[Audio] Sen. Reid Struggles for a Reason to Oppose Impeachment

Filed under: Impeachment Progress News, Nevada — Jodin Morey @ 10:52 pm

David Swanson, Democrats.com — Christiane Brown (KJFK, Reno) interviews Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in this audio clip from last week and presses him on why he admits impeachable offenses have been commited but opposes impeachment. Reid says that impeaching Bush would just give you Cheney, but Brown points out that Cheney can be impeached too (in fact, the only impeachment bill in Congress right now is to impeach Cheney). Reid says there’s not enough time, but Brown points out how swift past impeachments have been. Reid struggles and fails to find a coherent explanation.
Here’s the Audio:


August 28, 2007

Nevada demonstrators call for peace, impeachment

Filed under: Impeachment Events, Nevada — Mikael @ 2:58 pm

images2.jpgkolotv8 (Nevada)
Demonstrators Protest Bush, Iraq War
Reporter: Sandra Chereb AP

Demonstrators lined an intersection outside a convention hall Tuesday, carrying signs and beating pots and pans, to protest the Iraq war and President Bush, who was inside to address the American Legion National Convention.

The crowd of protesters grew under a hot sun from a handful to about 125. Many wore T-shirts that read “Impeach” and carried signs denouncing the president’s stance on Iraq.

The demonstration was organized by Americans Against Escalation
in Iraq. The group is part of a national campaign targeting lawmakers, including U.S. Rep. Dean Heller, R-Nev., who back the administration’s war policies.

The group invited Heller to a town hall meeting Tuesday night to discuss his views on the war, but he was not expected to attend, a group spokeswoman said.

(Original Article)


June 27, 2007

Letter: IMPEACHING THE VICE PRESIDENT WOULD BE GOOD FOR THE NATION

Filed under: Impeachment Related Oped, Nevada — Mikael @ 1:30 pm

state_profile.gifLahontan Valley News
and Fallon Eagle Standard (Nevada)

Well before and ever since his infamously secretive Energy Policy meeting in 2000, Vice President Richard Cheney has actively tried to mislead American opinion. He arrogantly believes that his “former association” with war-profiteering Haliburton, his 2002 effort to persuade the CIA to make unsubstantiated reports about Saddam’s possession of WMD, his sly encouragement of the outing of CIA operative Valerie Wilson and his recently reported stealth in undermining any White House staffer advice with which he disagrees can go undetected or overlooked by the American people.

A quick U.S. congressional impeachment of this modern day Robespierre would do much to restore our tarnished global image and act as a moral catharsis for the nation.

John Westwood

Fallon

(Source)


April 29, 2007

Reports from Impeach Events around the Country (World) – A28

Arkansas: University of Arkansas, Homer

California: Lafayette, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, Eureka, Monterey, Venice, Ventura






Colorado: Denver, Ft. Collins

Connecticut: Cornwall

Florida: Ft. Meyers, Miami, Second Report, Delray Beach, Naples, St. Petersburg



Georgia: Atlanta

Hawaii: Honolulu

Maine: Bangor, Portland

Massachusetts: Boston

Michigan: Ann Arbor, Kalamazoo, Grand Rapids, Greensboro


Minnesota: Bed Sheets 1/ Bed Sheets 2, Canoe Event, Calhoun Event

Missouri: Kansas City

New Jersey: Trenton

Nevada: Reno

New York: Ithaca, Central Park, Coney Island, New Paltz, Staten Island, Tompkins Square Park



North Carolina: Charolette

Ohio: Cleveland

Oregon: Portland

Pennsylvania: Berks County (waiting for report), Bryn Mawr, Main Line, Philadelphia, Pottstown



Tennessee: Memphis, Second Report

Texas: Austin, Houston

Utah: Salt Lake City

Vermont: Burlington

Virginia: Virginia Beach

West Virginia: Martinsburg

Wisconsin: Milwaukee

Washington DC April 26th and April 28th

Washington: Anacortes, Bainbridge Island, Federal Way, Seattle


——————————————–
International:
Italy: Rome

France

Help Initiate Cheney/Bush’s Impeachment


"I just want you to know that,
when we talk about war, we're really talking about peace."
-Bush, June 18, 2002

"War is Peace"
-Big Brother in George Orwell's 1984

Do-It-Yourself
Impeachment
Blog Categories
Our Whole Site

As heard on
the radio...
Bush hears the voices logo
KFAI radio interview
"I Hear The Voices"
Oct 5th Ad
• Oct 5th Interview
Mike Malloy
Peter Werbe
Get Impeach For Peace Stuff!
(pins, bumper stickers, hats, etc.)
Impeach Bush for Peace Stuff logo
protest picture
Calendar

Picts/Vid
Why Should Bush Have Been Impeached?Charges against Bush

Charges & Evidence


Videos

Bush's Defense
Arguments Against Bush Impeachment...

• If we impeach Bush, we’ll get President Cheney!
The first impeachment resolution introduced by McKinney included Bush, Cheney, and Rice. Although, even if we only initially pursue Bush, initiating the impeachment process will lead to an investigation that will implicate lots of people in the Bush administration who are guilty of committing crimes, including Cheney.

No matter who we get to replace Bush, we’ll be showing those in power that anyone who breaks the law will be held accountable.

• Promoting impeachment will seem too “extreme.”
Demanding that crimes be investigated is NOT extreme. Some previous impeachment attempts were considered extreme because they were pursued for actions that didn't rise to the level of a Constitutional crisis, which is what the impeachment tool is meant to be used for. Nixon's impeachment, however, was bipartisan.

  • We should wait to impeach...
Wait to impeach? We've waited 3 or more years too long already. We had enough evidence to impeach years ago. Remember, an impeachment only means you have enough evidence to warrant a trial, just like an indictment. Our congress people didn't take an oath to bipartisanship. They took an oath to the Constitution. Besides which, our troops, Iraqi civilians, and our own civil liberties are all waiting for this.
 
• Before we impeach, we should get some legislation passed...
And with unconstitutional Presidential Signing Statements, veto power, and the power of "Commander in Chief" at his disposal, how do you think Congress is going to get anything accomplished without first impeaching Bush?

If your tire blows while you're driving, do you stop to fix it? Or do you continue driving on your rim because to stop would take too much time?

• It hurts the democracy to go through a presidential impeachment. And Bush is a lame duck anyway.
Holding government officials accountable for their actions strengthens our democracy. Letting lawlessness stand weakens it.

Sometimes reprimanding a child (president) doesn't make the family (Washington) a happy place. But you still have to do it so the child and his siblings (future presidents) learn about accountability. Impeachment is horribly UNDERUSED, which is part of why there's so much corruption at the top. Politicians must learn to fear it. People think things are better because we improved the make-up of our law-making body, Congress. But Bush is BREAKING LAWS. So, it doesn't matter how many laws Congress passes if they don't serve their OVERSIGHT duties as well by impeaching. They swore to defend the Constitution. What are laws without enforcement?

Besides, considering Bush's track-record of breaking laws, he can still do a lot of damage. Our troops, Iran, and our Supreme Court are all endangered so long as he remains in office. Waiting until Bush is out of office will leave us complicit in any further crimes he commits. The Union of Concerned Scientists has estimated that the death toll from a "tactical" nuclear weapon of the kind Bush is contemplating using in Iran would be at minimum 3 million men, women, and children. The path of death would stretch across country boundaries into India.

Perhaps worst of all, we set a terrible precedent by allowing Bush to stay in office after he's broken so many laws. Impeachment will stop future presidents from using Bush's actions as justification for even more lawbreaking and erosion of civil liberties.

• I'm a Democrat/
Republican. If we support impeachment it will lower the chances of my party winning in 2008.

So, your party would rather win elections than do what's right for the country? I hope you're wrong. I also hope the public is willing to throw additional support to any party that holds our elected officials accountable for their actions. This has been historically true with every single impeachment effort launched. And this impeachment effort would begin with majority support (unlike most past impeachments including Nixon).

• Impeachment will never happen. Congress members will block it.
Well, all we need is a majority of support in the House. And 2/3rds vote in the Senate to remove Bush from office will happen once the evidence gets aired on the floor of the House, and subsequently the national media outlets. The political pressure will become too great.

Today's impossibility is tomorrow's reality. Congress members will realize that tying their political future to Bush reduces their chances of getting elected. Remember, one way or another, Bush is gone by 2009— but members of Congress may retain their offices beyond that date. Bush's poll numbers are extremely low, and most Americans support impeachment. This is a bipartisan movement. This means that if we make the pressure unbearable for Members of Congress, they'll turn on him to keep their own seats (like they did with Nixon). It's already starting to happen. While many Members of Congress have behaved unethically in the last few years, it's important to understand that this is related to their warped view of what's in their self-interest. Let's wake them up to their true self-interest (impeaching the president), by showing them our support for impeachment.

And even if we only impeach, and the Senate fails to do their duty and remove him from office, it will only implicate the Senators who fail to do their sworn Constitutional duty.

• But Speaker of the House Pelosi said that Impeachment was "off the table."

Pelosi most likely said this to remove any appearance of conflict-of-interest that would arise if she were thrust into the presidency as a result of the coming impeachment. What we need to do is to pressure Pelosi not to interfere with impeachment maneuverings within her party. Sending her Do-It-Yourself impeachments legitimizes her when she joins the impeachment movement in the future.

(Read More)