impeach bush for peace peach
(Go to our Main Page:ImpeachForPeace.org)

Add to Google

Daily Impeachment News:

March 6, 2008

Not Guilty! Highway Impeachment Protester Prevails in Court

Filed under: Impeachment Progress News,North Carolina — Jodin Morey @ 9:36 pm

DanceWater — Jonas Phillips was arrested on August 15, 2007 for holding a sign on a sidewalk in Asheville, NC. The sign said “Impeach Bush & Cheney”. His story is here.

Finally today, his case came to trail at the Buncombe County Courthouse. The District Attorney had offered to dismiss the charges for the court costs ($120) last year, but Jonas Phillips declined. It has been continued at least once since then. I was unable to attend his prior court dates, but today I took a vacation day so I could be an eyewitness to this MOCKERY OF DEMOCRACY.

The lawyer for Jonas started by asking for the charges to be dismissed. This was denied, after a long time that the judge spent reading some papers. District Attorney Pressley said that Jonas was obstructing the sidewalk and obstructing the view on I-240, and she also claimed that about 10 to 15 other people had been charged with this offense over the years. Jonas’s attorney said that Jonas was being prosecuted for political speech.

The DA and the police officers who were involved in the case seemed to get off topic quite often. Jonas was charged with obstructing the sidewalk, and they talked about how he was distracting drivers and running across the road. They also claimed that Jonas was doing all this for attention, and that he was “shaking” his sign over the freeway, which I thought was a fabrication, since Jonas would want people to read his sign and shaking it would make it hard to read. Both officers admitted that they had to do some research to figure out what to charge Jonas with.

Jonas stated that he wanted “eyes” to see his point of view and to counter the mainstream media. He testified that one pedestrian did pass him while he was doing the freeway blogging, and while one officer was sitting in his patrol car at the time (with his blue lights on and the roadway blocked), he did not see the pedestrian. There was never any evidence that people could not pass on the five foot wide sidewalk while Jonas was out there.

Jonas’ attorney kept making motions to dismiss, and they were denied. We were thinking that we would be going on to an appeal process, up until the minute Judge Hill started talking. The judge said that he was not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that Jonas had blocked the sidewalk or obstructed traffic, and Jonas was found NOT GUILTY.

There were about 30 local activists in the courtroom, and we cheered. Jonas spent $750 on lawyer fees over the last seven months that this trial dragged on.

I know there are people on Daily Kos and other bloggers who helped Jonas out ““ let me say THANK YOU from the Asheville activist community for all your support. Next time I see the local DA, I am going to ask them why they are arresting people who are holding signs and why they think that is a good use of my tax dollars.

This will be cross posted on Daily Kos blog and Blue NC blog. Picture is of Jonas after the trial.


February 1, 2008

Charlotte Protesters: Impeach and Arrest Cheney

Filed under: Impeachment Progress News,North Carolina — Jodin Morey @ 11:45 am

OperationImpeachment.org — Twenty some people protested Dick Cheney when he came to the Charlotte Chamber of Commerce to give a speech on January 31. Protesters called for Cheney to be impeached & arrested for war crimes, spying, lying us into wars, torture, war profiteering & other crimes against the people.

Grassroots Impeachment Movement (GRIM) brought a criminal complaint against Dick Cheney & gathered signatures on it.

People from Charlotte, Salisbury, Greensboro, Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Winston-Salem, Pinnacle, & Pittsboro took part in the protest.

Groups organizing for the protest included Action Center For Justice, CODEPINK-Charlotte, Grassroots Impeachment Movement (GRIM), and NC World Can’t Wait.

The Charlotte Observer, Channel 3 & 9, and maybe other TV news filmed and/or talked to protesters. AP took a photo which is posted on Yahoo News Photos. WFAE radio also spoke to a protester.

A full report, film, pictures, etc will be sent out later today or tomorrow and posted at www.CharlotteAction.org.


January 30, 2008

Protest Cheney in Charlotte Thursday – Call for Impeachment

Filed under: Impeachment Events,North Carolina — Jodin Morey @ 9:26 am

Impeach Dick Cheney for War Crimes & Crimes Against The People!
Bring The Troops Home Now!

Thursday, Jan. 31, 2008
10:00 am

Charlotte Chamber of Commerce
330 S. Tryon St
Charlotte, NC 28202

Vice President Dick Cheney will be in Charlotte tomorrow to give a speech at the Charlotte Chamber Of Commerce. We will be there to demand Dick Cheney be impeached & held accountable for his lies, crimes, and war profiteering.

Bring signs, posters, puppets, friends, family, etc. Spread the word.

Info: Action Center For Justice
www.CharlotteAction.org
bringthemonhome@yahoo.com
704-307-8262


[Video] Rep. Price Asked to Support Impeachment

Filed under: Impeachment Events,North Carolina — Jodin Morey @ 4:36 am


On August 20, 2007 a group of concerned citizens met with Rep. David Price (D) NC-4 to ask him to take a leadership role in pushing for impeachment hearings to investigate the numerous crimes committed by the Bush/Cheney regime. We argued that our country was in a Constitutional crisis. Rep. Price disagreed.

The following are excerpts of the meeting split up into sections. You can find out more about supporting impeachment efforts at www.coalitionfortheconstitution.com

Part 2

Part 3


January 23, 2008

[Video] Impeachment SmackDown III: Fein v. Tomasky

Filed under: Impeachment Events,North Carolina — Jodin Morey @ 6:40 pm


In the tradition of the Lincoln/Douglas Debates, Coalition for the Constitution hosted a Debate on Impeachment between Republican Bruce Fein (pro-impeachment) and Democrat Michael Tomasky (anti-impeachment).

Find our more information at our website www.CoalitionfortheConstitution.com

The Debate was held on January 15, 2008 at 7pm, at the Carrboro Century Center and was be moderated by UNC Professor of Leadership and Public Policy, W. Hodding Carter III, and hosted by Orange County Commissioner Moses Carey. The full debate can be seen here:

Impeachment is mentioned six times in the United States Constitution, including most clearly in Article II, section 3 which reads:

“The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

Recently, privileged resolution HR 799 (HR 333 re-introduced), Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney, was introduced on the floor of the House. Former presidential candidate Joe Biden has also raised the impeachment issue on the campaign trail in connection with a possible war with Iran. Robert Wexler is also pushing for hearings at www.wexlerwantshearings.com

To help the public better understand the pros and cons of impeachment, the organizers have lined up two well-known political pundits to debate and answer those questions.
Bruce Fein is a lawyer, specializing in constitutional and international law, who served as an associate deputy attorney general under Ronald Reagan. He has recently been a strong advocate for the impeachment of current U.S. vice-president Dick Cheney and President George W Bush. Fein graduated from Harvard Law School in 1972. In March 2007, he founded the American Freedom Agenda with Bob Barr, David Keene and Richard Viguerie. Fein is counsel to Ron Paul’s campaign for the 2008 Presidential nomination. One of his most scathing indictments of Dick Cheney appeared in his article for Slate.com entitled, “Impeach Cheney, The Vice President has run utterly amok and must be stopped.” http://www.slate.com/id/2169292/

Michael Tomasky, is a progressive journalist who has recently written an article about impeachment, entitled, “The Dumbest Move the Dems Could Make”, which has been cited by the Democratic Leadership, and 4th District North Carolina Congressman, David Price, as the reasoning behind their refusal to support impeachment. Tomasky has served as the executive editor of The American Prospect and is the author of Left for Dead: The Life, Death, and Possible Resurrection of Progressive Politics in America (1996), a study of the intellectual collapse of the American left. “Here is a link to his article “The Dumbest Move the Dems could Make”: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/02/AR2007080201767.html


Next Page »

"I just want you to know that,
when we talk about war, we're really talking about peace."
-Bush, June 18, 2002

"War is Peace"
-Big Brother in George Orwell's 1984

Do-It-Yourself
Impeachment
Blog Categories
Our Whole Site

As heard on
the radio...
Bush hears the voices logo
KFAI radio interview
"I Hear The Voices"
Oct 5th Ad
• Oct 5th Interview
Mike Malloy
Peter Werbe
Get Impeach For Peace Stuff!
(pins, bumper stickers, hats, etc.)
Impeach Bush for Peace Stuff logo
protest picture
Calendar

Picts/Vid
Why Should Bush Have Been Impeached?Charges against Bush

Charges & Evidence


Videos

Bush's Defense
Arguments Against Bush Impeachment...

• If we impeach Bush, we’ll get President Cheney!
The first impeachment resolution introduced by McKinney included Bush, Cheney, and Rice. Although, even if we only initially pursue Bush, initiating the impeachment process will lead to an investigation that will implicate lots of people in the Bush administration who are guilty of committing crimes, including Cheney.

No matter who we get to replace Bush, we’ll be showing those in power that anyone who breaks the law will be held accountable.

• Promoting impeachment will seem too “extreme.”
Demanding that crimes be investigated is NOT extreme. Some previous impeachment attempts were considered extreme because they were pursued for actions that didn't rise to the level of a Constitutional crisis, which is what the impeachment tool is meant to be used for. Nixon's impeachment, however, was bipartisan.

  • We should wait to impeach...
Wait to impeach? We've waited 3 or more years too long already. We had enough evidence to impeach years ago. Remember, an impeachment only means you have enough evidence to warrant a trial, just like an indictment. Our congress people didn't take an oath to bipartisanship. They took an oath to the Constitution. Besides which, our troops, Iraqi civilians, and our own civil liberties are all waiting for this.
 
• Before we impeach, we should get some legislation passed...
And with unconstitutional Presidential Signing Statements, veto power, and the power of "Commander in Chief" at his disposal, how do you think Congress is going to get anything accomplished without first impeaching Bush?

If your tire blows while you're driving, do you stop to fix it? Or do you continue driving on your rim because to stop would take too much time?

• It hurts the democracy to go through a presidential impeachment. And Bush is a lame duck anyway.
Holding government officials accountable for their actions strengthens our democracy. Letting lawlessness stand weakens it.

Sometimes reprimanding a child (president) doesn't make the family (Washington) a happy place. But you still have to do it so the child and his siblings (future presidents) learn about accountability. Impeachment is horribly UNDERUSED, which is part of why there's so much corruption at the top. Politicians must learn to fear it. People think things are better because we improved the make-up of our law-making body, Congress. But Bush is BREAKING LAWS. So, it doesn't matter how many laws Congress passes if they don't serve their OVERSIGHT duties as well by impeaching. They swore to defend the Constitution. What are laws without enforcement?

Besides, considering Bush's track-record of breaking laws, he can still do a lot of damage. Our troops, Iran, and our Supreme Court are all endangered so long as he remains in office. Waiting until Bush is out of office will leave us complicit in any further crimes he commits. The Union of Concerned Scientists has estimated that the death toll from a "tactical" nuclear weapon of the kind Bush is contemplating using in Iran would be at minimum 3 million men, women, and children. The path of death would stretch across country boundaries into India.

Perhaps worst of all, we set a terrible precedent by allowing Bush to stay in office after he's broken so many laws. Impeachment will stop future presidents from using Bush's actions as justification for even more lawbreaking and erosion of civil liberties.

• I'm a Democrat/
Republican. If we support impeachment it will lower the chances of my party winning in 2008.

So, your party would rather win elections than do what's right for the country? I hope you're wrong. I also hope the public is willing to throw additional support to any party that holds our elected officials accountable for their actions. This has been historically true with every single impeachment effort launched. And this impeachment effort would begin with majority support (unlike most past impeachments including Nixon).

• Impeachment will never happen. Congress members will block it.
Well, all we need is a majority of support in the House. And 2/3rds vote in the Senate to remove Bush from office will happen once the evidence gets aired on the floor of the House, and subsequently the national media outlets. The political pressure will become too great.

Today's impossibility is tomorrow's reality. Congress members will realize that tying their political future to Bush reduces their chances of getting elected. Remember, one way or another, Bush is gone by 2009— but members of Congress may retain their offices beyond that date. Bush's poll numbers are extremely low, and most Americans support impeachment. This is a bipartisan movement. This means that if we make the pressure unbearable for Members of Congress, they'll turn on him to keep their own seats (like they did with Nixon). It's already starting to happen. While many Members of Congress have behaved unethically in the last few years, it's important to understand that this is related to their warped view of what's in their self-interest. Let's wake them up to their true self-interest (impeaching the president), by showing them our support for impeachment.

And even if we only impeach, and the Senate fails to do their duty and remove him from office, it will only implicate the Senators who fail to do their sworn Constitutional duty.

• But Speaker of the House Pelosi said that Impeachment was "off the table."

Pelosi most likely said this to remove any appearance of conflict-of-interest that would arise if she were thrust into the presidency as a result of the coming impeachment. What we need to do is to pressure Pelosi not to interfere with impeachment maneuverings within her party. Sending her Do-It-Yourself impeachments legitimizes her when she joins the impeachment movement in the future.

(Read More)