impeach bush for peace peach
(Go to our Main Page:ImpeachForPeace.org)

Add to Google

Daily Impeachment News:

February 12, 2008

Sen. Jim Webb Suggests Legal Action Against Bush On Iraq

Filed under: Impeachment News,Virginia — Ifp @ 9:54 am

jimwebb.jpgBy Sam Stein, Huffington Post

Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) thinks legal action against the Bush administration may be needed if the president pursues a long-term military presence in Iraq without Congress’ approval.

“I’m not convinced we don’t need to have a lawsuit ready,” Webb told the Huffington Post. “This is a classic separation of powers issue. I started to talk to people about this today.”

In recent days the administration has seemingly backed away from attempting to secure extended military-to-military relationship with the Iraqi government to replace a current U.N. Mandate. Webb and others — most notably Rep. Rosa DeLauro and Sen. Hillary Clinton — have pushed legislation that would restrict federal money for any such agreement unless it came in the form of a congressional treaty. And while a victory on that front seems within grasp, the possibility still exists, Webb warned, for the administration to ultimately circumvent congressional input.

“They are characterizing this as within the authority of the Executive Branch. They will wait to August when everyone is at the conventions, and leave it on our doorstep,” said the Virginia Democrat. “If the Senate hasn’t acted by then, they are going to announce an agreement between the Executive Branch and Iraq.”

(Original Article)


February 8, 2008

More Reps Sign Wexler’s Impeachment Letter

ImpeachPac – Congressman Wexler urges support for Cheney Impeachment Hearings

The following members of Congress have joined as signatories to my letter to Chairman Conyers in support of Cheney Impeachment Hearings:

(*= member of the Judiciary Committee)

Baldwin, Tammy, WI, 2nd *
Capuano, Michael E., MA, 8th
Clarke, Yvette D., NY, 11th
Clay, Wm. Lacy, MO, 1st
Cohen, Steve, TN, 9th *
Farr, Sam, CA, 17th
Grijalva, Raúl M., AZ, 7th
Gutierrez, Luis V., IL, 4th *
Kucinich, Dennis J., OH, 10th
Lee, Barbara, CA, 9th
Moore, Gwen, WI, 4th
Moran, James P., VA, 8th
Thompson, Mike, CA, 1st
Towns, Edolphus, NY, 10th
Woosley, Lynn, CA, 6th
Wexler, Robert, FL, 19th *
Wynn, Albert Russell, MD, 4th


January 26, 2008

Activists Pressure Rep. Bobby Scott

Filed under: Impeachment Progress News,Virginia — Jodin Morey @ 9:34 pm

After Downing Street, Andrea Miller – I joined the impeachment rally yesterday at Bobby Scott’s office; it was excellent and there were about 15 people. Everyone at the rally went upstairs to Bobby Scott’s office and Chris Dorsey spoke eloquently about the need for impeachment and how the Cheney/Bush impeachment has nothing to do with partisanship. Most notably we had the Ron Paul Virginia coordinator with us (though the office did not know about this affiliation). Allan added that we are recruiting new blood for Congress that will support impeachment as the will of the people. He told the staffer that there are new candidates in the 8th, 1st and 10th; I added that I was running in the 4th.

I think this double-tack may help to have an impact. As new people step up to run, this should encourage the old guard to carefully consider where they stand with their constiuency and are they out of touch. Bobby Scott’s office is in a predominantly African-American neighborhood and we got honks for impeachment from everyone driving by including police and fire folks driving official vehicles.

I think we need to now have the “suits” approach Bobby Scott as well as the extreme activists. We need to show support in the movement from all walks of life (in short everybody that votes for Bobby Scott — or the new candidate that more closely reflects their political goals and ideals.)


September 30, 2007

Chesapeake Citizens Bring ImPEACHment to DC

Filed under: Impeachment Events,Virginia — Jodin Morey @ 11:01 pm

On Friday, September 21st, at lunchtime, a couple of Chesapeake Citizen farmers took the country’s growing hunger for Impeachment into the Longworth and Rayburn House Office Buildings.

We reckon our public servants in the House ought to know what the majority of Americans want from them, and old-fashioned citizen lobbying has proved ‘fruitless’ to date.

We were warmly welcomed by security personnel at the building’s entrance. A security staff member even kindly took our photo (using our camera).

Once inside, we visited Rep. Kucinich’s office to give him peaches in gratitude for H. Res 333, and we stopped in at Rep. Conyers’ office to offer him peaches in exchange for impeachment.

We then sang and strolled as we made our way to the cafeterias of both buildings, where we placed delicious peaches on the lunch tables of smiling staffers.

What we sang as we walked through the hallowed halls and crowsed cafeterias:
“Peaches, apples, pears are still ripe,
But rotten criminals must go.
Peaches, apples, pears are still ripe
But Bush and Cheney must go.
Reap what you sow.
And Congress you should know
You too will reap what you sow.”

Chesapeake Citizens utilizes true stories, geography and the imagination to re-dream our watershed back into its ongoing 10,000-year role as abundant, life-sustaining provider for all. We create and support: reparations, social justice actions, diverse democracy, and a thriving regional eco-economy.

At last Saturday’s DC ANSWER anti-war rally, eight Chesapeake Citizens had a splendid time doing our sublime and ridiculous Ripe imPeach Farmers Market Musical Street Theater Action. We sang adaptations of agrarian themed nursery rhymes, accompanied by an accordion, a cow bell, and egg and apple shakers. We also gave away dozens of ripe local peaches to hungry activists.

The time is ripe for impeachment, and impeachment will preserve our Constitution.

This absurd humorous action was created as a sane response to the absurd and tragic fact that Bush and Cheney have committed more impeachable crimes than any other administration in our country’s history, and yet Congress is doing nothing.


August 24, 2007

Rep. Tom Davis (R-VA) dares visit with anti-war constituents

Filed under: Impeachment Related News,Virginia — Mikael @ 8:24 pm

ph2007082302014.jpg
washingtonpost.com
For a Man in the Middle on Iraq, Church Provides No Sanctuary
By Dana Milbank

The sign outside Accotink Unitarian Universalist Church in Burke announces that it is a “liberal, welcoming religious community.” For Rep. Tom Davis yesterday, it was more liberal than welcoming.

The Virginia Republican, a possible Senate candidate who supports the Iraq war, had bravely agreed to attend a meeting of the antiwar Americans Against Escalation in Iraq. It was a journey into the belly of the beast, and Davis got out in one piece. Almost.

(Original Article)


Next Page »

"I just want you to know that,
when we talk about war, we're really talking about peace."
-Bush, June 18, 2002

"War is Peace"
-Big Brother in George Orwell's 1984

Do-It-Yourself
Impeachment
Blog Categories
Our Whole Site

As heard on
the radio...
Bush hears the voices logo
KFAI radio interview
"I Hear The Voices"
Oct 5th Ad
• Oct 5th Interview
Mike Malloy
Peter Werbe
Get Impeach For Peace Stuff!
(pins, bumper stickers, hats, etc.)
Impeach Bush for Peace Stuff logo
protest picture
Calendar

Picts/Vid
Why Should Bush Have Been Impeached?Charges against Bush

Charges & Evidence


Videos

Bush's Defense
Arguments Against Bush Impeachment...

• If we impeach Bush, we’ll get President Cheney!
The first impeachment resolution introduced by McKinney included Bush, Cheney, and Rice. Although, even if we only initially pursue Bush, initiating the impeachment process will lead to an investigation that will implicate lots of people in the Bush administration who are guilty of committing crimes, including Cheney.

No matter who we get to replace Bush, we’ll be showing those in power that anyone who breaks the law will be held accountable.

• Promoting impeachment will seem too “extreme.”
Demanding that crimes be investigated is NOT extreme. Some previous impeachment attempts were considered extreme because they were pursued for actions that didn't rise to the level of a Constitutional crisis, which is what the impeachment tool is meant to be used for. Nixon's impeachment, however, was bipartisan.

  • We should wait to impeach...
Wait to impeach? We've waited 3 or more years too long already. We had enough evidence to impeach years ago. Remember, an impeachment only means you have enough evidence to warrant a trial, just like an indictment. Our congress people didn't take an oath to bipartisanship. They took an oath to the Constitution. Besides which, our troops, Iraqi civilians, and our own civil liberties are all waiting for this.
 
• Before we impeach, we should get some legislation passed...
And with unconstitutional Presidential Signing Statements, veto power, and the power of "Commander in Chief" at his disposal, how do you think Congress is going to get anything accomplished without first impeaching Bush?

If your tire blows while you're driving, do you stop to fix it? Or do you continue driving on your rim because to stop would take too much time?

• It hurts the democracy to go through a presidential impeachment. And Bush is a lame duck anyway.
Holding government officials accountable for their actions strengthens our democracy. Letting lawlessness stand weakens it.

Sometimes reprimanding a child (president) doesn't make the family (Washington) a happy place. But you still have to do it so the child and his siblings (future presidents) learn about accountability. Impeachment is horribly UNDERUSED, which is part of why there's so much corruption at the top. Politicians must learn to fear it. People think things are better because we improved the make-up of our law-making body, Congress. But Bush is BREAKING LAWS. So, it doesn't matter how many laws Congress passes if they don't serve their OVERSIGHT duties as well by impeaching. They swore to defend the Constitution. What are laws without enforcement?

Besides, considering Bush's track-record of breaking laws, he can still do a lot of damage. Our troops, Iran, and our Supreme Court are all endangered so long as he remains in office. Waiting until Bush is out of office will leave us complicit in any further crimes he commits. The Union of Concerned Scientists has estimated that the death toll from a "tactical" nuclear weapon of the kind Bush is contemplating using in Iran would be at minimum 3 million men, women, and children. The path of death would stretch across country boundaries into India.

Perhaps worst of all, we set a terrible precedent by allowing Bush to stay in office after he's broken so many laws. Impeachment will stop future presidents from using Bush's actions as justification for even more lawbreaking and erosion of civil liberties.

• I'm a Democrat/
Republican. If we support impeachment it will lower the chances of my party winning in 2008.

So, your party would rather win elections than do what's right for the country? I hope you're wrong. I also hope the public is willing to throw additional support to any party that holds our elected officials accountable for their actions. This has been historically true with every single impeachment effort launched. And this impeachment effort would begin with majority support (unlike most past impeachments including Nixon).

• Impeachment will never happen. Congress members will block it.
Well, all we need is a majority of support in the House. And 2/3rds vote in the Senate to remove Bush from office will happen once the evidence gets aired on the floor of the House, and subsequently the national media outlets. The political pressure will become too great.

Today's impossibility is tomorrow's reality. Congress members will realize that tying their political future to Bush reduces their chances of getting elected. Remember, one way or another, Bush is gone by 2009— but members of Congress may retain their offices beyond that date. Bush's poll numbers are extremely low, and most Americans support impeachment. This is a bipartisan movement. This means that if we make the pressure unbearable for Members of Congress, they'll turn on him to keep their own seats (like they did with Nixon). It's already starting to happen. While many Members of Congress have behaved unethically in the last few years, it's important to understand that this is related to their warped view of what's in their self-interest. Let's wake them up to their true self-interest (impeaching the president), by showing them our support for impeachment.

And even if we only impeach, and the Senate fails to do their duty and remove him from office, it will only implicate the Senators who fail to do their sworn Constitutional duty.

• But Speaker of the House Pelosi said that Impeachment was "off the table."

Pelosi most likely said this to remove any appearance of conflict-of-interest that would arise if she were thrust into the presidency as a result of the coming impeachment. What we need to do is to pressure Pelosi not to interfere with impeachment maneuverings within her party. Sending her Do-It-Yourself impeachments legitimizes her when she joins the impeachment movement in the future.

(Read More)