impeach bush for peace peach
Mikael's Accountability Blog

(Go to our Main Page:ImpeachForPeace.org)

Add to Google

Daily Impeachment News:

June 13, 2007

ImpeachforPeace.org meets with Minneapolis City Council Members Cam Gordon, Elizabeth Glidden hosted by Green Party of Minnesota

Filed under: IfP Events, Impeachment Events, Minnesota — Mikael @ 11:07 pm

dscn0729.JPGMembers of ImpeachforPeace.org and the Green Party of Minnesota met with Minneapolis City Council members Cam Gordon, a Green Party member and Elizabeth Glidden in a public forum at the Wolves Den on Franklin Avenue last night.

More to come later, but here is the text of the speech that ImpeachforPeace co-founder Mikael Rudolph gave to the 30-35 people in attendance:

“I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend…”… what? Our borders from the Mexican terrorists? No. My political party, my staff?, tax breaks for the wealthiest and Profit margins for multi-national corporations? No. That oath is not even to defend and protect the citizens of this great nation.

Article II Section 1 of the Constitution calls for the incoming President to swear on his honor to “…preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

All other public servants from Water Commissioner up through Congress and including the Vice President swear an oath that includes some version of committing “to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic”. This includes members of city councils.

Having sworn that oath, having given their word of honor, public officials such as members of the Minneapolis City Council are ‘under oath’ for the duration of their terms of office.

oath: A solemn, formal declaration or promise to fulfill a pledge, often calling upon God, a god, or that which is held most sacred or valuable by the swearer.

To some for whom one’s word and name in and of themselves are sacred – always being witnessed, as exemplified by the character of John Proctor in Arthur Miller’s “The Crucible”, which means “A severe test, as of patience or belief; a trial.”, who simply had to lie to have his life spared from a witchhunt. Proctor did not lie, saying: “Because it is my name! Because I cannot have another in my life!” and after saying that he was “not worth the dust on the feet” of those of such character that they were hung for standing on principle and telling the truth in full integrity, Proctor said “How may I live without my name?” That, my neighbors, is an oath.

Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution states:
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

The definition of “high crimes & misdemeanors” is under continual debate, but it seems to be generally agreed upon that if a crime is committed by a member of the executive branch, not able to be justifiably excepted on national security grounds, it by definition becomes a ‘high crime’ as an abuse of authority, but criminal activity is not the only impeachable offense.

Jon Roland of the Constitution Society wrote:

“Holding a particular office of trust is not a right, but a privilege, and removal from such office is not a punishment.” In other words, public office is a gift from the populace given daily. If no longer deserved, that gift should cease and that privilege should be revoked..

Roland went on to say: “…the appropriate subject matter for an impeachment and removal proceeding is the full range of offenses against the Constitution and against the rights of persons committed by subordinate officials and their agents which have not been adequately investigated or remedied.

(This was written in January of 1999 concerning the merits of the impeachment trial which our previous President was undergoing)

1). The Supreme Court in Rosul v. George W. Bush ruled detainees were being wrongfully imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay Detention Center in Cuba. The Bush Administration’s detainment policies and actions were ruled unconstitutional and illegal – in violation of Amendments V, VI &VII. The use of torture, legally justified by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and thus condoned by President Bush and Vice President Cheney is an additional violation to the 8th Amendment.

2). The Supreme Court again in Hamdan v. Donald Rumsfeld, George W. Bush, et al.) ruled that the Military Commissions instituted by the Bush Administration violate the Universal Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Conventions to which we are bound by American law. Again, the Bush Administration’s actions were found by the highest court of the land to be illegal and unconstitutional – violating Amendments V, VI, VII .

3). A Federal Court in NSA vs. ACLU found the NSA program of broad data-mining and warrantless wire-tapping of U.S. citizens illegal and unconstitutional – violating the Fourth Amendment.

What do these three cases have in common other than the obvious? All programs have continued, having their names and definitions changed or modified like a gold ring in a pig’s snout.

Rep. Dennis Kucinich’ (D-OH) bill to impeach Vice President Cheney, which just yesterday gained an 8th cosponsor, Maxine Waters of California focuses on the manipulation of pre-war intelligence, lying about WMDs, lying about a connection between Iraq & Al Qaeda, Saddaam/Osama and lying about Iran posing an immediate and dire threat (Deja vu anyone?).

An argument for impeachment could be made about the legality of this self-appointed Unitary Executive Bush’s signing statements – more than all previous Presidents combined – thus largely taking upon himself the Constitutionally granted law-making authority which rightfully belongs to Congress. An argument could be made regarding possible criminal financial interactions with convicted felon Jack Abramoff, illegal profiteering by Cheney through Halliburton, Brown & Root, Bechtel and Blackwater and especially the compromising of our national security with the ‘outing’ of Non-official Cover CIA agent Valerie Plame in an act of political retribution against her husband Joseph Wilson. It is not hyperbole to consider this bootless, cowardly action coming during wartime as possibly high treason for various members of this ‘all hat and no cattle’ Connecticut Cowboy administration.

All of these crimes & misdemeanors could and should bring down Bush as well as Cheney since Bush has done nothing to hold anyone in his criminal regime accountable – which he is duty-bound to do. Even if not convicted of any direct wrong doing himself, Bush could and should be impeached and removed from office for neglecting to hold those under him accountable in violation of his oath.

Conversely, this President has bent over backwards shielding and protecting Karl Rove from legal liability in the Scooter Libby case and especially now in protecting Alberto Gonzales from justice being served for the Attorney General’s politicizing of the Judicial Branch through wrongful firings of federal attorneys.

The most common argument against impeachment is that if we impeach Bush, we’ll get Cheney as President. Personally I fear impeaching Cheney might make Bush President, but actually nearly all resolutions of the hundreds passed or in process around the nation, including the one we are asking Councilman Gordon to bring forth for a vote on the Minneapolis City Council, call for the impeachment of both Cheney and Bush.

The argument that such a resolution would be non-binding is specious as well. Since when are the opinions of the local citizenry as embodied by our local elected officials not of value? Grassroots politics, which this nation’s ongoing health is deeply reliant upon, are all about speaking the truth to power upwards through the system which is what we are doing here today.

Impeachment is not extreme. We are a nation of laws. No American is above the law, and those privileged to be granted the authority to lead should be held more stringently to the law, not less.

Is it too late? Impeachment hearings against Richard Nixon began on May 9th, 1974. Nixon resigned on August 8th – less than 3 months later. Nixon was to be impeached for obstruction of justice, abuse of power and defiance of subpoenas. Anyone following the ‘Attorneygate’ story recognizes the current parallels.

When House Speaker Nancy Pelosi decreed impeachment to be “off the table” and said Democrats were “ready to govern”, the nation – which had spoken clearly in the November mid-term election – was told to look forward to an end to the Iraq War, accountability for the Bush Administration and the passage of progressive domestic legislation to help so many damaged by this most atrocious administration. Instead, the corporate faction of the national Democrats just handed over a blank check to Bush’s War. Modest yet decent gains such as a raise in the minimum wage only have come by making huge concessions to the corporate Republicans and to Bush’s veto and signing statement threats.

Democrats gambling on waiting out the Bush term and expecting another landslide win in ‘08 take heed: Yesterday’s Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll says just 27 percent of Americans approve of the way Congress is doing its job. Congress with Democrats in the majority of both Houses has lower approval ratings than President Bush. The possibility of at least the Senate returning to the GOP if not both Houses and the swearing in of President Fred Thompson is a real concern, not a nightmare fantasy.

Democrats, when one party has shown strength and integrity in holding the other accountable historically, they have made gains in the next elections.

In our appeals to the Minneapolis City Council over the past few months for passage of an impeachment resolution we received a broad spectrum of replies from those that could be bothered to respond to their constituents – about half of them. After multiple appeals and inquiries, Council member Lisa Goodman finally replied: “I’ll make it simple for you. I do not have the time to reply to this set of questions or to chat about this on the phone about this issue.”

Others, including Council member Paul Ostrow, who believes that “this President may go down as the nation’s worst” and also including Council members Betsy Hodges and Ralph Remington, see this federal issue as “outside of the pervue” of the council.

The Minneapolis City Council, to their great credit, recently passed a “Bring the Troops Home” resolution 9-0 with 4 abstentions. Council members Gordon and Glidden are to be greatly commended for there every effort to make this happen and for “yay” votes on our behalf.

This resolution, apparently based upon the fact that constituents have family members ‘over there’ and our tax dollars are continuing to fund this misguided and unwelcome occupation, leaving less for domestic needs, makes resoundingly clear that the City Council does indeed feel that federal policy – even foreign policy IS within their pervue.

Council members Gordon and Glidden, thank you again for coming. I don’t have family ‘over there’, but it is my Constitution, my Bill of Rights, those are my freedoms and my liberties that are under comprehensive assault by these confirmed domestic enemies to the Constitution who took our White House by bloodless coupe d-etat in Florida in 2000 and extended their infestation of it in like manner in Ohio in 2004.

An extremely dangerous precedent is being set. Lying to congress to initiate a war of aggression, an ongoing occupation for war-profiteers of a country 80% of whose citizens want us to leave, 50% of whom feel violence against American troops is justified, whose parliament has passed a resolution asking us to leave, suppression of the press and free speech, false news reports being generated from the White House and distributed despite a cease and desist order from a lower court.

The suspension of habeas corpus/due process, the very basis of the democratic ideal and dream since 1215 is in effect today. They are discussing… DISCUSSING… restoring it in Congress.

What more do we need? If this President is not impeached, if this Vice President is not impeached, the impeachment clause should be lifted from the Constitution through Amendment.

I am calling upon you as my proxie on my City Council to fulfill your oath – even if the vote would be 12-1 against impeachment, which it won’t be.

America desperately needs leaders at this time, this crucible in our nation’s history. I am calling upon you to lead. The rest can follow or tell them on my behalf to get the hell out of our way. Justice must and will be served.

Honor your oaths.


11 Comments

  1. Good going, Mikael. I couldn’t have said it better myself. Will there be a video on youtube soon? -Peace, Kitty

    Comment by Kitty B. Kahn — June 14, 2007 @ 1:09 pm

  2. Dear Group,
    Why Mr. Armageddoom Bush and Chenny have not been impeached is far beyond me! It only shows that there is something very insidiously wrong with the democratic process in our country. In fact, President Bush imposed tenure is the worst ever! As America’s greatest prophet has forewarned, ” In the Final Hour, the true face of the wicked will be fully shown”. If this is NOT referring to Bush and his devious corrupt self-serving republician party directly, then I don’t know anyone else who fit the bill!
    Please, continue to bring the impeachment issue to bear, and I believe that soon within the next 290 days or less, these two evil people ( the Last of the Three Antichrists) will finally come to Justice!

    Comment by nathaniel x vance — June 14, 2007 @ 1:09 pm

  3. [...] As a follow-up to our wildly successful impeachment Town Hall meeting with Minneapolis City Council Members Cam Gordon and Elizabeth Glidden, we’re attending the Minneapolis City Council Meeting TOMORROW (Friday) MORNING and again in two weeks (June 29th)! [...]

    Pingback by Impeach Bush For Peace » TOMORROW Pressure the Minneapolis City Council to Impeach — June 14, 2007 @ 8:00 pm

  4. OH, Mikael!! I am so proud of you!! You said it for ALL of us – and said it perfectly! Tomorrow I’ll be looking for places where I can quote you…

    Consider yourself schmoozeled!!

    Comment by PIZZED — June 14, 2007 @ 9:37 pm

  5. Great Speech!!!

    Comment by Susan — June 14, 2007 @ 10:13 pm

  6. you laid it down on the line. I always say you can lie, but sooner or later the truth catches you with your pants down.nice going Mike!
    you might want to throw in the families tie to Hilter for extra punch.

    Comment by Russ — June 15, 2007 @ 10:03 am

  7. Much like the suspicious suppression of 9/11 evidence and truth by the Bush Administration, the facts around the Bush family Nazi connection – while true – tend to push more people away then draw them in. We must use the most skilful means possible in this, not just attack with everything we have.

    Kucinich seems to be taking this tact in making Cheney defend his pre-War lies in an impeachment trial first, then bring up the other stuff along the way.

    Here is an excellent legitimate source for facts in and around the Bush family Nazi connections as well as the parallels between the Third Reich and what is going on in America today:

    http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/reich.html

    Comment by Mikael — June 15, 2007 @ 1:32 pm

  8. [...] Dear Minneapolis citizens, Please take 2 minutes to contact your city councilperson and ask him/her to support and pass a resolution for the impeachment of Bush and Cheney. During the June 13th forum with speakers from ImpeachforPeace.org, Cam Gordon, Green Party City Councilman explained the strategic process for making it more feasible to get the Impeachment Resolution on the City Council agenda. If we inundate the city council with phone calls and emails every day, they will realize there is a strong grassroots movement of constituents behind this issue. Until then, they will simply believe that there are more important things to deal with (like the victimization of the poor). [...]

    Pingback by Impeach Bush For Peace » Minneapolis Citizens: Help us Impeach Bush, City Council — June 15, 2007 @ 11:38 pm

  9. I am in oregon i wise i could join to impeach that murdering baby killer lier robber hang the bastards good luck with ur impeach meeting i hope you get the job done

    Mike Moyes
    baker city oregon

    Comment by Micheal Moyes — June 16, 2007 @ 7:54 pm

  10. wonderful speech–which reminds people of the ‘American creed’–which is our Constitution. Those who oppose impeachment of Bush/Cheny fail to udnerstand that NOT impeaching them continues the undermiining of our Constitution and ultimately, the experiement in democracy. The prededent Bush/Cheny have set for presidential perogatives as ROYAL POWER WITHOUT ANY RESTRAINTS is incredibly dangerous…and onlY impeachment (with one hopes being prosecuted as war criminals at some point) is the only remedy.

    Comment by Lydia Howell, writer with PULSE — June 17, 2007 @ 3:09 pm

  11. [...] As a follow-up to our wildly successful impeachment Town Hall meeting with Minneapolis City Council Members Cam Gordon and Elizabeth Glidden, we’re attending the Minneapolis City Council Meeting Friday, July 20th! [...]

    Pingback by Impeach Bush For Peace » Pressure Minneapolis City Council to Impeach, Friday July 20th — July 17, 2007 @ 3:41 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

"I just want you to know that,
when we talk about war, we're really talking about peace."
-Bush, June 18, 2002

"War is Peace"
-Big Brother in George Orwell's 1984

Do-It-Yourself
Impeachment
Blog Categories
Our Whole Site

As heard on
the radio...
Bush hears the voices logo
KFAI radio interview
"I Hear The Voices"
Oct 5th Ad
• Oct 5th Interview
Mike Malloy
Peter Werbe
Get Impeach For Peace Stuff!
(pins, bumper stickers, hats, etc.)
Impeach Bush for Peace Stuff logo
protest picture
Calendar

Picts/Vid
Why Should Bush Have Been Impeached?Charges against Bush

Charges & Evidence


Videos

Bush's Defense
Arguments Against Bush Impeachment...

• If we impeach Bush, we’ll get President Cheney!
The first impeachment resolution introduced by McKinney included Bush, Cheney, and Rice. Although, even if we only initially pursue Bush, initiating the impeachment process will lead to an investigation that will implicate lots of people in the Bush administration who are guilty of committing crimes, including Cheney.

No matter who we get to replace Bush, we’ll be showing those in power that anyone who breaks the law will be held accountable.

• Promoting impeachment will seem too “extreme.”
Demanding that crimes be investigated is NOT extreme. Some previous impeachment attempts were considered extreme because they were pursued for actions that didn't rise to the level of a Constitutional crisis, which is what the impeachment tool is meant to be used for. Nixon's impeachment, however, was bipartisan.

  • We should wait to impeach...
Wait to impeach? We've waited 3 or more years too long already. We had enough evidence to impeach years ago. Remember, an impeachment only means you have enough evidence to warrant a trial, just like an indictment. Our congress people didn't take an oath to bipartisanship. They took an oath to the Constitution. Besides which, our troops, Iraqi civilians, and our own civil liberties are all waiting for this.
 
• Before we impeach, we should get some legislation passed...
And with unconstitutional Presidential Signing Statements, veto power, and the power of "Commander in Chief" at his disposal, how do you think Congress is going to get anything accomplished without first impeaching Bush?

If your tire blows while you're driving, do you stop to fix it? Or do you continue driving on your rim because to stop would take too much time?

• It hurts the democracy to go through a presidential impeachment. And Bush is a lame duck anyway.
Holding government officials accountable for their actions strengthens our democracy. Letting lawlessness stand weakens it.

Sometimes reprimanding a child (president) doesn't make the family (Washington) a happy place. But you still have to do it so the child and his siblings (future presidents) learn about accountability. Impeachment is horribly UNDERUSED, which is part of why there's so much corruption at the top. Politicians must learn to fear it. People think things are better because we improved the make-up of our law-making body, Congress. But Bush is BREAKING LAWS. So, it doesn't matter how many laws Congress passes if they don't serve their OVERSIGHT duties as well by impeaching. They swore to defend the Constitution. What are laws without enforcement?

Besides, considering Bush's track-record of breaking laws, he can still do a lot of damage. Our troops, Iran, and our Supreme Court are all endangered so long as he remains in office. Waiting until Bush is out of office will leave us complicit in any further crimes he commits. The Union of Concerned Scientists has estimated that the death toll from a "tactical" nuclear weapon of the kind Bush is contemplating using in Iran would be at minimum 3 million men, women, and children. The path of death would stretch across country boundaries into India.

Perhaps worst of all, we set a terrible precedent by allowing Bush to stay in office after he's broken so many laws. Impeachment will stop future presidents from using Bush's actions as justification for even more lawbreaking and erosion of civil liberties.

• I'm a Democrat/
Republican. If we support impeachment it will lower the chances of my party winning in 2008.

So, your party would rather win elections than do what's right for the country? I hope you're wrong. I also hope the public is willing to throw additional support to any party that holds our elected officials accountable for their actions. This has been historically true with every single impeachment effort launched. And this impeachment effort would begin with majority support (unlike most past impeachments including Nixon).

• Impeachment will never happen. Congress members will block it.
Well, all we need is a majority of support in the House. And 2/3rds vote in the Senate to remove Bush from office will happen once the evidence gets aired on the floor of the House, and subsequently the national media outlets. The political pressure will become too great.

Today's impossibility is tomorrow's reality. Congress members will realize that tying their political future to Bush reduces their chances of getting elected. Remember, one way or another, Bush is gone by 2009— but members of Congress may retain their offices beyond that date. Bush's poll numbers are extremely low, and most Americans support impeachment. This is a bipartisan movement. This means that if we make the pressure unbearable for Members of Congress, they'll turn on him to keep their own seats (like they did with Nixon). It's already starting to happen. While many Members of Congress have behaved unethically in the last few years, it's important to understand that this is related to their warped view of what's in their self-interest. Let's wake them up to their true self-interest (impeaching the president), by showing them our support for impeachment.

And even if we only impeach, and the Senate fails to do their duty and remove him from office, it will only implicate the Senators who fail to do their sworn Constitutional duty.

• But Speaker of the House Pelosi said that Impeachment was "off the table."

Pelosi most likely said this to remove any appearance of conflict-of-interest that would arise if she were thrust into the presidency as a result of the coming impeachment. What we need to do is to pressure Pelosi not to interfere with impeachment maneuverings within her party. Sending her Do-It-Yourself impeachments legitimizes her when she joins the impeachment movement in the future.

(Read More)