Mikael of ImpeachforPeace Empowering citizens to hold our elected (or otherwise in power) servants accountable

October 1, 2008

Palin/Couric interview – complete with “cringe moments”

Filed under: Climate Change,liberal/conservative — Mikael @ 2:18 am

I was more impressed with Sarah Palin in this interview than any I had seen previously, which isn’t saying that much, but I wanted to give her a chance because I was asked nicely by a respectable online adversary from my blog.

Thank you, Earl.

I can see how her frankness and her readiness to engage in conversation can be endearing and attractive. I was pulled in a little… until the inevitable flurry of ‘cringe moments’ that has even some conservatives calling for her to remove herself from the McCain ticket.



I was surprised to hear her say she considered herself a feminist – her absolute, under-all-circumstances anti-abortion stance notwithstanding. She maintains that tenet based upon the morality she holds as an evangelical christian, as contradictory as it may seem to most feminists.

It is an underlying hypocrisy for her to claim, as she did in this interview, that nobody who gets an abortion should ever wind up in jail when she would like to see Roe v. Wade reversed, thus making participating in abortion a federal crime.

She also didn’t seem to understand, despite Couric’s gentle prodding, that the “Morning After Pill” is a contraceptive device that prevents conception from taking place. Her opposition to it seemed based upon an uninformed perception of how it works.*

[*See comments below for further discussion on the difference between contraception and abortion and where the “Morning After Pill” fits into that debate.]

Palin wasn’t swayed by the fact that offshore drilling and tapping into ANWAR will have a negligible affect on our overall oil supply in the long run and not at all for up to ten years. She claimed to adhere to an “all of the above” energy policy yet clung to her rally cry that “Drill, Baby, Drill” constituted an acceptable national energy policy.

Her acceptance of the scientific facts that global warming exists and human activity is a contributing factor and that evolution should be taught as an accepted scientific principle in our schools came as a relief. But then she played down the fact that human activities were a major culprit in global warming and claimed that we needed to focus on dealing with the symptoms of global warming without worrying about the reasons for it.

If human activity is a cause, then human activity must be adjusted to redirect the course of climate change. This is something that she either doesn’t understand, or is in denial about due perhaps to a dedication to oil and gas industry supporters.

The following exchange was especially priceless, and appears to reveal Palin’s personal history to be one devoid of investment over time in reading and researching the major challenges our nation and the world are grappling with as we have entered the 21st century. This apparent lack of intellectual curiosity or dedication to knowledge throw light on the reasons for Palin’s very thin grasp of major national and international issues – a lifetime shortcoming that a few short weeks of desperate cramming by the McCain campaign could not possibly have brought her up to speed on:

Couric: “And when it comes to establishing your World View, I was curious… what newspapers and magazines did you regularly read before you were ‘tapped’ for this to stay informed and to understand the world?”

Palin: “I read most of them again with a great appreciation for the press, for the media…”

Couric: “Like what ones specifically, I’m curious that you…?”

Palin: “Um… all of ’em.. any of ’em that, um, have been in front of me over all these years, ummm… I have a vast…”

Couric: “Can you name a few?”

Palin: “…I have a vast variety of sources where we get our news too. Alaska isn’t a foreign country where it’s kinda suggested… It seems like… ‘Wow… how could you keep in touch with what the rest of Washington DC may be thinking and doing when you live up there in Alaska.’ Believe me, Alaska is like a microcosm of America!”

If Governor Palin had answered the question and at some point mentioned The New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, L.A. Times, The National Review, The Conservative, The Nation, even The Drudge Report for gosh sakes, I would sense a track record of at least attempting to stay informed over the years.

Am I being too cynical when I think perhaps Field & Stream, Redbook, Good Housekeeping , Reader’s Digest, the Kabela’s Catalogue and a daily bible verse may not be the best preparation for the nation’s second highest office?

Do I want her to be a ‘heartbeat away’ from the Presidency. Uh… no. Not a chance. And the more national exposure she gets, the more America is coming to the same conclusion.

Nice lady.

Not a qualified candidate.

(Source)

July 17, 2008

The world’s rubbish dump: a garbage tip that stretches from Hawaii to Japan

Filed under: Climate Change — Mikael @ 5:13 pm

05RubbishGraphic_15022a.jpgThe Independent

By Kathy Marks, Asia-Pacific Correspondent, and Daniel Howden
Tuesday, 5 February 2008

A “plastic soup” of waste floating in the Pacific Ocean is growing at an alarming rate and now covers an area twice the size of the continental United States, scientists have said.

The vast expanse of debris – in effect the world’s largest rubbish dump – is held in place by swirling underwater currents. This drifting “soup” stretches from about 500 nautical miles off the Californian coast, across the northern Pacific, past Hawaii and almost as far as Japan.

Charles Moore, an American oceanographer who discovered the “Great Pacific Garbage Patch” or “trash vortex”, believes that about 100 million tons of flotsam are circulating in the region. Marcus Eriksen, a research director of the US-based Algalita Marine Research Foundation, which Mr Moore founded, said yesterday: “The original idea that people had was that it was an island of plastic garbage that you could almost walk on. It is not quite like that. It is almost like a plastic soup. It is endless for an area that is maybe twice the size as continental United States.”

Curtis Ebbesmeyer, an oceanographer and leading authority on flotsam, has tracked the build-up of plastics in the seas for more than 15 years and compares the trash vortex to a living entity: “It moves around like a big animal without a leash.” When that animal comes close to land, as it does at the Hawaiian archipelago, the results are dramatic. “The garbage patch barfs, and you get a beach covered with this confetti of plastic,” he added.

The “soup” is actually two linked areas, either side of the islands of Hawaii, known as the Western and Eastern Pacific Garbage Patches. About one-fifth of the junk – which includes everything from footballs and kayaks to Lego blocks and carrier bags – is thrown off ships or oil platforms. The rest comes from land.

Mr Moore, a former sailor, came across the sea of waste by chance in 1997, while taking a short cut home from a Los Angeles to Hawaii yacht race. He had steered his craft into the “North Pacific gyre” – a vortex where the ocean circulates slowly because of little wind and extreme high pressure systems. Usually sailors avoid it.

He was astonished to find himself surrounded by rubbish, day after day, thousands of miles from land. “Every time I came on deck, there was trash floating by,” he said in an interview. “How could we have fouled such a huge area? How could this go on for a week?”

Mr Moore, the heir to a family fortune from the oil industry, subsequently sold his business interests and became an environmental activist. He warned yesterday that unless consumers cut back on their use of disposable plastics, the plastic stew would double in size over the next decade.

Professor David Karl, an oceanographer at the University of Hawaii, said more research was needed to establish the size and nature of the plastic soup but that there was “no reason to doubt” Algalita’s findings.

“After all, the plastic trash is going somewhere and it is about time we get a full accounting of the distribution of plastic in the marine ecosystem and especially its fate and impact on marine ecosystems.”

Professor Karl is co-ordinating an expedition with Algalita in search of the garbage patch later this year and believes the expanse of junk actually represents a new habitat. Historically, rubbish that ends up in oceanic gyres has biodegraded. But modern plastics are so durable that objects half-a-century old have been found in the north Pacific dump. “Every little piece of plastic manufactured in the past 50 years that made it into the ocean is still out there somewhere,” said Tony Andrady, a chemist with the US-based Research Triangle Institute.

Mr Moore said that because the sea of rubbish is translucent and lies just below the water’s surface, it is not detectable in satellite photographs. “You only see it from the bows of ships,” he said.

According to the UN Environment Programme, plastic debris causes the deaths of more than a million seabirds every year, as well as more than 100,000 marine mammals. Syringes, cigarette lighters and toothbrushes have been found inside the stomachs of dead seabirds, which mistake them for food.

Plastic is believed to constitute 90 per cent of all rubbish floating in the oceans. The UN Environment Programme estimated in 2006 that every square mile of ocean contains 46,000 pieces of floating plastic,

Dr Eriksen said the slowly rotating mass of rubbish-laden water poses a risk to human health, too. Hundreds of millions of tiny plastic pellets, or nurdles – the raw materials for the plastic industry – are lost or spilled every year, working their way into the sea. These pollutants act as chemical sponges attracting man-made chemicals such as hydrocarbons and the pesticide DDT. They then enter the food chain. “What goes into the ocean goes into these animals and onto your dinner plate. It’s that simple,” said Dr Eriksen.

(Original Article)

March 31, 2008

[VIDEO]: We Can Solve the Climate Crisis

Filed under: Climate Change — Mikael @ 12:04 pm



As Americans, we don’t wait for other people to take the lead when a problem needs to be fixed. In this ad, William H. Macy shows that by solving the climate crisis, we are honoring an American tradition.

(Source)

Powered by WordPress