The Beginning of the End
By William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t | Columnist
And when he had opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven about the space of half an hour.
– Revelations 8:1, King James Bible
George W. Bush’s State of the Union (SOTU) speeches have been the basis for a new kind of drinking game for several years now, basically because the things have always needed some kind of actual substance from somewhere, and because it was a good way to dull the pain of it all. The rules: 1. When he says the word “terra” or “terra-ists,” take a drink. 2. When he says “tax cuts,” take a drink. 3. When he says “Iraq,” take a drink. 4. When he says “nook-yuh-lerr,” take a drink and a shot and a good swift kick to the head. Et cetera.
But that’s just one night out of the year. Reality has proven to be far more alcoholic in nature. For seven years now, the whole phenomenon of this government has been one long drinking game played out each and every day. The rules of this game? 1. Say the words, “George W. Bush is in charge of the country.” 2. Turn off the TV. 3. Just drink.
Sounds familiar, right? Just about everyone has played that game a time or two by now. We have endured seven Bush SOTU speeches as of last night. Seven years worth of lies, carnage, greed, disgrace, failure, ignominy, calamity heaped upon calamity heaped upon calamity for more than two thousand five hundred days now, with three hundred and fifty seven more days still to go.
Seven speeches. Seven years.
No more.
The final deal went down in DC last night, wreathed in all the pomp and circumstance of political theater and media spectacle. The first tangible evidence this long national and planetary nightmare is actually beginning to come to an end was served up live on network television, for the viewing pleasure of a thoroughly disgusted and entirely disinterested American public.
If Bush’s lips are moving, it means he must be lying; so it has been for all those days, and so it was again on Monday evening. Some 75 percent of the citizenry believe this country to be “on the wrong track,” and since the gomer giving the speech last night is seen as being largely responsible for putting us all on this “wrong track” to begin with, a vast American majority pretty much didn’t give a fig about what he had to say.
All that most people cared about was the historic significance of the night itself. It was The Last Bush SOTU Speech Ever.
Seven speeches.
Seven years.
No more.
Remember Bush’s SOTU speech from January 20 of 2003? That was the one when he told America Iraq was in possession of 6,000 liters of anthrax, 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin, 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent – for those without calculators, 500 tons equals 1,000,000 pounds – plus around 30,000 munitions to deliver these agents, mobile biological weapons labs and uranium from Niger for use in a robust nook-yuh-lerr weapons program.
Take your drink. Take your shot. Don’t forget your kick to the head: Each and every single one of those comprehensively-debunked claims can still be found on the White House web site.
Five American soldiers died in Iraq during the afternoon preceding Bush’s SOTU speech on Monday. They were patrolling the city of Mosul and were struck by a roadside bomb that was followed up with lethal gunfire. There have now been 36 American soldiers killed in Iraq during the month of January, and 3,940 killed in total since Bush gave that January 2003 SOTU address and thus signed the death warrants for our fallen troops.
We don’t do body counts, so there’s no accurate way to assess how many tens or hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have been killed and maimed since that 2003 speech. Last Wednesday, 60 Iraqis were killed and 280 others were wounded when a huge bomb exploded in Mosul. The casualties, according to a New York Times report, were “mostly children, women and the elderly.”
“Americans are still dying at the rate of one every day,” wrote Chicago Tribune columnist Steve Chapman last week. “And violent civilian Iraqi deaths, according to the independent web site Iraq Body Count (iraqbodycount.org), have averaged about 1,000 a month since September. That’s far lower than last January, but it’s no better than in 2005, and it’s well above the levels of 2004 – when Iraq was already in the grip of bloody chaos. To pronounce that reduction a success is like driving your car into a lake and then bragging when you pull it halfway out.”
Bush managed all this with just the one 2003 SOTU speech. He’s given seven of the things now, so adjust the body-count mathematics accordingly. Seven speeches. Seven years.
No more.
Monday night’s speech was almost breathtaking in its lack of substance. He promised to bring the 9/11 perpetrators to justice, again. He promised to bring democracy to the Middle East, again. He talked up tax cuts for the financially solvent, again. He threatened Iran, again. He massaged the debacle known as “No Child Left Behind,” again. He mispronounced “nuclear” at least three times, again. Basically, Bush could have just as easily been replaced by one of those high-school-chemistry-class projection screens showing some random video snippets from his other six SOTU addresses. Nobody would have noticed the difference.
There was no there, there. Again.
We have to put up with this man and his people for less than a year, or so most people believe. A story on today’s Washington Post front page by Michael Abramowitz, however, reeled off a laundry list of pre-speech challenges for Bush that was capped by this line: “That is the problem Bush faces as he prepares to deliver his seventh and probably final State of the Union address tonight.”
“Probably final”?
“Probably final”?!
Drink.
William Rivers Pitt is a New York Times and internationally bestselling author of two books: “War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn’t Want You to Know” and “The Greatest Sedition Is Silence.” His newest book, “House of Ill Repute: Reflections on War, Lies, and America’s Ravaged Reputation,” is now available from PoliPointPress.
Scott,
Are you just one more “hit and run” attack troll with nothing to add to the public discourse or are you sticking around for the discussion? I guess we will know soon if you return or not.
Scott: Nice strawman.
We should ask the Washington Post why it said “probably”. Being in Washington, DC, they should have changed it to Final. No Probably
I think the editor or proofreader would have questioned the word probably and say it should be deleted?
probably final means that the Media is complicit!
I really feel he will create an emergency and will declare martial law. He will suspend the elections and declare himself dictator. He made comments on this issue!
You don’t get everything you want. A dictatorship would be a lot easier.” Describing what it’s like to be governor of Texas.
(Governing Magazine 7/98)
— From Paul Begala’s “Is Our Children Learning?”
“I told all four that there are going to be some times where we don’t agree with each other, but that’s OK. If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I’m the dictator,” Bush joked.
— CNN.com, December 18, 2000
“A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there’s no question about it, ” [Bush] said.
— Business Week, July 30, 2001
He was not joking. He was serious. He wants to be a dictator. Look at his actions! Blackwater is his own private army. Hiltler started this way and created the SS.
This Web site falls in with all other media that is based upon hatred, ridicule, name-calling and naive premises. It’s full of allegations, accusationn, speculations and falsehoods. The tone of the site is clear with a prevailing theme of “I hate Bush”. Anyone that hates can’t be trusted for an opinion – which is all the site promotes.