In the article in “TIME”
A Unanimous no to Nixon,
Where Nixon The court found Nixons claim of executive
privilage was too “broad”and undifferenetiated.”Where it no Danger to the nation if the tapes were turned over
to the sirca for in camera.Bush doesn’t have any business
obstructing justice in my opion and from other article
that susbstantiate,Bush doesn’t have a valid reason to abuse executive privilage,which it sound very loud here
as such,bush “beyound broad and undifferenetiated.”
Bush needs to be sworn in to testify.
Impeach,Only the honest survive.
In the article in “TIME”
A Unanimous no to Nixon,
Where Nixon The court found Nixons claim of executive
privilage was too “broad”and undifferenetiated.”Where it no Danger to the nation if the tapes were turned over
to the sirca for in camera.Bush doesn’t have any business
obstructing justice in my opion and from other article
that susbstantiate,Bush doesn’t have a valid reason to abuse executive privilage,which it sound very loud here
as such,bush “beyound broad and undifferenetiated.”
Bush needs to be sworn in to testify.
Impeach,Only the honest survive.