“Blue Dog” Conservative Rep. Mike Michaud (D-ME) calls for Cheney impeachment

mike_michaud.jpg
Rep. Mike Michaud (D., Maine) Writes Strong Letter to Conyers Calling for Cheney Impeachment Hearings
afterdowningstreet.org
submitted by David Swanson

Congressman Mike Michaud, a conservative and Blue Dog Democrat from Maine sent a letter over the holiday break to House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers calling for impeachment hearings of Vice President Dick Cheney.

Michaud is not among the 25 cosponsors of Rep. Dennis Kucinich’s H Res 333 (also known as H Res 799), a resolution stipulating articles of impeachment against Cheney. Michaud is also not among a group of Judiciary Committee Members led by Rep. Robert Wexler (Michaud is not on the committee) who have called for hearings to begin, and who plan to send their own letter to Conyers this month. But Michaud shares their position that hearings should be held first and articles drafted when and if called for by the evidence exposed. For progress of the various groups of congress members now pushing for impeachment of Cheney see: http://impeachcheney.org

Maine has been a hotbed of impeachment activism in recent months: http://afterdowningstreet.org/me

Efforts have been led by an activist coalition: http://maineimpeach.org and a group of lawyers called Maine Lawyers for Democracy. Citizens have staged sit-ins in the offices of Rep. Michaud and also Rep. Tom Allen demanding support for impeachment. Those efforts may be paying off, and Michaud appears in the letter below to have grasped some of his constituents main arguments for impeachment.

While known as a conservative, Michaud has turned against the occupation of Iraq and joined a small number of Congress Members in voting against further funding. Iraq is also the first issue Michaud mentions in his letter to Conyers. Here is the full text of the letter, also attached below as a PDF.

Dear Chairman Conyers,

I write today to request that you include vigorous hearings into the abuses of power by this Administration and include impeachment hearings of Vice President Richard Cheney in the Judiciary Committee schedule for the second session of the 110th Congress.

As you are aware, the House of Representatives voted on November 7th to send a resolution of impeachment of Vice President Cheney to the Judiciary Committee. I urge you to commence these proceedings. There is no doubt that at the very least this Administration has dangerously expanded the scope of executive authority and flaunted the constitutionally defined separation of powers.

Serious allegations have been raised against the Vice President regarding his role in mischaracterizing information that led to the invasion of Iraq, in similarly mischaracterizing information about Iran’s nuclear program, the outing of a CIA agent as political retaliation, the abuse of detainees in contravention of the Geneva Conventions, and the illegal wiretapping of American citizens. As a recent poll indicates, 70% of the American public believes that the Vice President has abused his power.

This is not an attack on Vice President Cheney or any other member of this Administration. Impeachment investigations must not be about the man or his personal life; they must focus on whether the office of the Vice President has illegally expanded its power or abused the law. Expansions and potential abuses of power by this Administration become precedents for future ones, which lead to further erosions of our constitutional rights. That is why these investigations must be held with the utmost seriousness of purpose and must lay all the facts on the table. We do not know what the result of any investigation will be, but this is the only way to restore the faith of the American people in their government.

(Original Article)

6 Comments

  1. Ron Paul complains about Cheney and Bush but refuses to sign on to the bill demanding that Cheney be impeached. We need people in congress to sign this bill and not just mention impeachment as an option. Talk is cheap. Signing on to the Impeachment people is action. Wexler is taking action with a signed petition which will be presented to Congress. Kucinich has done his part. It is time other people do their part as well. It is not fair that a few do all the work. There are 435 Representatives. I am grateful for what Kucinich and Wexler have done. We need to thank them. We need other people to help out.

  2. Jodin, I thought if the session ends, all bills that are stuck in committee die. Like Cynthia McKinney’s bill. She filed it knowing that the session was ending and it would just die.

  3. Good question Mark. I think so. Kucinich is committed to keeping it alive, but it would be best if it were re-written and filed by someone else with Kucinich to give it more respect. The more conservative the backer, the more likely it will gain more support. That is why Michaud jumping on the impeachment bandwagon is a very big deal. He is considered a “Blue Dog” Democrat – very conservative.

    Check out this article:

    http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_dave_lin_080103_tipping_point_on_imp.htm

    Tipping Point on Impeachment is Approaching (by Dave Lindorff)

  4. Will this bill have to be re-filed in 2008? That bill was the 2007 Legislative session. The original died in the Judiciary committee? Who will re-file it?

Comments are closed.